From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27668: 26.0.50; Crash with display-line-numbers t Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:38:48 +0200 Organization: not if I can help it Message-ID: <87379vjfgn.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k23d7ovv.fsf@gmail.com> <877ezd7luq.fsf@gmail.com> <83bmopitky.fsf@gnu.org> <87vamx65x0.fsf@gmail.com> <837ezdiq3z.fsf@gnu.org> <871spl5x5h.fsf@gmail.com> <834luhiinr.fsf@gnu.org> <8760ewviyt.fsf@gmail.com> <83pod4gv0i.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2xkl246.fsf@gmail.com> <83mv88gqzi.fsf@gnu.org> <87mv88kxps.fsf@gmail.com> <83eftkgn06.fsf@gnu.org> <87iniwku3y.fsf@gmail.com> <83zic7fnrv.fsf@gnu.org> <87d1931jiy.fsf@gmail.com> <83vamvfit1.fsf@gnu.org> <87k23bqm2n.fsf@gmail.com> <83o9snf8qx.fsf@gnu.org> <874luf3wir.fsf@gmail.com> <83lgnrf3tn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1500302419 4941 195.159.176.226 (17 Jul 2017 14:40:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:40:19 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: 27668@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 17 16:40:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Bw-0000jH-Je for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:40:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50800 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7C1-0001BC-Ot for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:40:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34634) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Bw-00019a-9h for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Bq-0005lZ-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:40:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41891) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Bq-0005lI-FC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Bq-0007vZ-94 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87k23d7ovv.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27668 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.150030235230407 (code B ref -1); Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2017 14:39:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44568 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7B2-0007uM-DC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:39:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43375) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7B1-0007uB-28 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:39:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Av-0005R7-8w for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Av-0005R2-6J for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34335) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7At-0000sd-Jr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:39:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Ao-0005P4-UA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=47019 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Ao-0005Oo-NA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:38:58 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dX7Ag-0005LI-RX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:38:50 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Mail-Copies-To: never Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xl7swyK3lxowaS83s0EoTQvYdNY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134665 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Great, thanks. So here's the next step: we set a hardware watchpoint > on the enabled_p flag of that glyph row, and see who sets it. You > will need to remove that line which fixed the problem, I guess. Eli, I haven't forgotten about this, but my reproduction recipe has stopped working :-( If it starts crashing again I'll look again. In the meantime I don't think anyone else has reported any similar problems, so it must be something very specific in my setup. Thanks Robert