From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28458: 26.0.50; Does Emacs support SAN (subject alternate names)? Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:07:54 +0200 Message-ID: <87377kduj9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874ls58oc8.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <877ewwdvir.fsf@gmail.com> <87ingggoei.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505740161 26658 195.159.176.226 (18 Sep 2017 13:09:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:09:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 28458@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 18 15:09:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtvnU-0006bh-DA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 15:09:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36562 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtvnb-0006zm-MC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:09:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45116) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtvnQ-0006xU-9z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:09:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtvnK-00004z-Jk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:09:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dtvnK-00004s-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:09:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtvnK-0000ly-2b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:09:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28458 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 28458-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28458.15057400922916 (code B ref 28458); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28458) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Sep 2017 13:08:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45683 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtvmT-0000kv-CB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:08:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com ([74.125.82.45]:47092) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dtvmM-0000kK-9x for 28458@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:08:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id i189so2515547wmf.1 for <28458@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 06:08:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=oJieId1onFvYjHL/UKVenakNHq6DXhFuUJoTXuGpPdY=; b=q6bKmawR/IRU8T1GlNqZX6k40tMulVMK58gJB8ppBUprNPvYLE1qxcxVUSzwwfyvQ0 QHY4uaHzd3mnDu5SnYeqzIEvHkHNajC6ebDSIiNzQH7R62tiupJoqV3DMJGCpU5gofeY FikO3dcLXKetDrZK/G73Df2gJYb6So4NXbG8seHRfPNiVkvzspXNqUpn4oPXUY9y8733 zV/nfS+nYt/yKsanC2HSBkkJbD/8/WsBrzlGHTlpzaqpimhmUTs56lydikw6RpMIN10p GKv4kTx8w5a7o9DJqHdNHzHuvtPbJmF1xg2HHV7v6SE3w4WBKbeJUkHfI0ahNk4Fx8HQ dA4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references :gmane-reply-to-list:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version; bh=oJieId1onFvYjHL/UKVenakNHq6DXhFuUJoTXuGpPdY=; b=eZllEGNNGba7p5XQwopx4R/nQ0gD27loITwHUsuo8Ut19BDfJDr1R0T6cV6PcMBNFA +W9g1RJd+oNx3dxeSLbvEPwMiDVKAToAU57xaGvSAPEVKDtJon/1vctHEF4fxw0BF42g nFWO9EjXNqnRVwUMhRzxN7qQZaGChn1xKl9zuAmofFPpPRE9BIwYYaxRR0Q2DmE++11e eoYeIKRuKQTtp+S6I7Lib0kzHonnSY+ckn8wzndLjwqDQKKkUPI6Q3RG22/T+PTUoILv eKSD7OlB5lhndlAvlZP37mo1j2xc/EPNfEB5QE7PsktEFNG6sboKAGCEvZmZpWFgB2+e asHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiJ71fO8Sr4WcIqzkMMLe29/qrr1e6zfIe4mN40yY1GNAjpD+0c hz+lEW7w//fopUGzOzw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QAC5G4bXfuqpeVG+4TSgtaFZ3XfyVkt6H1CopJIyvn3TP+ZKGkgbSL0Bevvo4YGwWDMJEoCRQ== X-Received: by 10.28.217.134 with SMTP id q128mr9567865wmg.116.1505740076151; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 06:07:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rpluim-ubuntu ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w18sm3390984wra.61.2017.09.18.06.07.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Sep 2017 06:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes In-Reply-To: <87ingggoei.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:52:05 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:137049 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Robert Pluim writes: > >> Good question. Example sites/certificates? (I have a vague memory of >> there being more than one way to do SAN, perhaps we're looking at the >> wrong field) > > https://1000-sans.badssl.com/ > > has a lot of SANs. :-) > Yes, but that one works fine for me :-) > Of course, after reporting this bug, it hasn't happened once to me > afterwards (that Emacs has claimed that it can't verify a certificate > due to a bad host name), so I've been unable to pursue this (possible) > issue any further... I've just re-read and it looks like there is ample scope for getting things wrong there.... Regards Robert