From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29599: 26.0; `dframe.el' binds keys unconditionally when loaded Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:15:11 -0500 Message-ID: <873746c10g.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <878tdzbimi.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <161e969d-1b2b-4bcc-9e24-a932fe6a2655@default> <876093bck5.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1513689257 8405 195.159.176.226 (19 Dec 2017 13:14:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:14:17 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 29599@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 19 14:14:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRHil-0001aw-Tc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 14:14:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43882 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRHki-0000Ff-Aq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:16:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33259) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRHkb-0000FS-D0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRHkY-0008Un-3G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:16:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60910) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eRHkX-0008UY-Uy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRHkX-0000K8-Ok for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:16:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29599 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 29599-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29599.15136893211196 (code B ref 29599); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 13:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29599) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2017 13:15:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41358 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRHjs-0000JE-Tr for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:15:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]:44235) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eRHjq-0000J1-RM for 29599@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 08:15:19 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f182.google.com with SMTP id w127so13534488iow.11 for <29599@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:15:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=DwMMxWuW1LceBUjAShCg1GaYhLxZqG51wUK4qUzTaaU=; b=pbflyYmY5SHIPZrpNgr3+hD6HHkWOSold4rA8iFYByVHY22oIDkwAparCr3D2V7sP9 HPQi3QGNQiNUFXW0HrYAwjXyk/YV1s0DNQJu5MBNAbthMa2yIlxlL7dT6oDbqUM8iFzP kugRVdwp5xPZzsBEu7fgjyXPF+AHAzfHylqa1Gn/foLDWvDUoxEvujQ9GqMqjdCHShxj xBuO6u3XRQ1HD7VCY8oBrJuYfLWkXCoOr/XbvmNH2eOeaQbdCaOg909oUafec8BEHwE2 +GESIjr4Yfrd4c1wmPunSLnvY2lxC8Xug/Qj7wKCHO1V618BaZEvrxdmvpzk5M/YYYkW Rd4w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=DwMMxWuW1LceBUjAShCg1GaYhLxZqG51wUK4qUzTaaU=; b=lYUgktR44zVp5Pfp3L5bkdh/6/B6FRV4PIQ8OIZ1mFYyKqSN/iGp/EJdjKaAWaQFrh 0VQEgkW2u7yHycyKJTneuraFqGuuVltgbTg2STdbQ1qLUcqMs1NkjEAEuR0p9IHwqzoR xK7KNEmGlI4dgpzDUpHNgB7YOimfcnJ299GimCtnsYMIeH3Lcec0oMqnhORDjVnhC+Og MRcr6yROMqcny1qo8gQ5eCA7DbmI6yeezF8621wr3ecDBbPXfKIH91UjEnlVnsy0NDDF AuVttgCZWDAszR1yJu8z9r+GpICd0afjtbcKsb7/JUgWNuhqHoAs4alGOvHBTY2NXxqD bA+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIiOKnW0eTjutUXsHxYaPUtZpqqN/Ht3vY5FOS8jq0APy4JCk9o TY2BoM8VBBFRP3qDLmGqSzh12Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotSN1IM285GtHSpkGspE9iYMzJTl/BjOT/0MxCJbaG96a1eOU4dl1FF0C7o63+Qkvx8rI5yXQ== X-Received: by 10.107.174.201 with SMTP id n70mr4081008ioo.45.1513689313115; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:15:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zebian ([45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i76sm1221956itf.3.2017.12.19.05.15.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 19 Dec 2017 05:15:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:21:25 -0800 (PST)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:141250 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > That's quite a bug report - no report at all (?). > > Perhaps it was because all of the actual report was > in another bug report that was closed, and that now > redirects to this (vacuous) report? > > The only thing in #28607 is a link to an emacs-devel > thread. No description of the problem (?). > > Anyway, it's not clear to me how that bug relates to this one. > > This one is about explicitly binding keys when the > source code loads. I don't get the impression that > that one is about this at all. (What am I missing?) Oh, yeah, I probably should have pointed to the linked stuff. Bug#28048 has more info. Anyway, the relation is just that it probably explains how you got dframe loaded (I have got dframe loaded in my session as well, even though I don't use it).