From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-26 0643952: Add documentation to ecomplete.el Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:10:05 +0100 Message-ID: <873733h182.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20180117105626.27351.89699@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20180117105628.5272622EE4@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87bmhrtpa8.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1516273738 19756 195.159.176.226 (18 Jan 2018 11:08:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:08:58 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 18 12:08:54 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ec83u-0004en-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:08:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51976 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec85u-00025c-Hp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:10:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec85G-00024r-2E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:10:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec85B-0006Gt-4B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:10:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:50830) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ec85A-0006Fy-Qz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 06:10:09 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([213.220.157.193]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MEGIi-1eZzQk3uYq-00FWvA; Thu, 18 Jan 2018 12:10:07 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 18 Jan 2018 11:58:21 +0100") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:TqsMdXAsoS121YFjJHPNGT7gjUfef1WkDoIaRGLcI70XdM0f/XE tVxpqi4LfvKsqJvM4JJe5J2xoF4JZT2hs1OAy446yyOUTrc91jUgGNKxelrMu0+Dkry+dWL HTOKl2asYa1lA4PZN5nTL70qI1XjNHgB0D/BOL9CYsSUuCSstndpHu2BVtj/XZGBSw2E0Xn Dbd2hYirdkoQE7TiZB3Rw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:foyB88B/sz8=:GDIxkIWMaIUUFe5OkVkfhH fzn09iz8uw+ZDgP+V0ckx1+sdZbtyTpqO40aLs4/uJ2Pur4NGOGnCNhDufz81OPgXIg+M17Xm 2zaYPx0aqUxrl17PSFeCxtJdFMECu+80ksMg/oEIPIh43cW4/djL8i4JJwXaxB3hfCLU+QK9Z PxuGuE5Al56PMcNFUfqplvPacmeoCfWoxV3Vte7N9gMUJHwvM0WZka4+xN5C8ssDo897W0Cw0 vmVl1y8H+bgOuhiX8QZMV7CTS94VSNsf+9daFSsmqH7NnxuyXtMmlRRqr6tpz/bwzJ31BMA+4 k2AGmc5Y3Oim8AxuWSq4X/TnapAA/7HP2Rg19KMhBjbmaVTzi1n44JkbR6XpVVc5tpgYubnnJ LpPMNs0wkwbP9XJQWcXC29o3CtIbSWcBm222W8RPjMnxBkWtQH400M+25bNk+PnggTjLIswNR LCo0/FgNaXZFC02UPD9bZpykc08O0PPtja19OqeKTnKp+EbquvzXPQLHRRJmuaSfGahrK2aIA 4IOvZ1atLoOLhIUBMGTosvYFes7bVEjtjPRTwmrnbLmGvede1Vp8pYPUyxSwTcNwuRIR8Or4b bi8cfGmcHxuZphvf5XAKOSJF1d9Kd9asHck9R7UBQvE53VNFUZsRrQ7jvJsO+/xHZ83h5zO8d GMKVd+pBjkB8VIoS5Tgkne5k76uDotw84xOVk/7nXq4yJikSqhGJjjqpByBlaq67qkwe4bq9i Pl7NwSt6FpFJPCIo0UCGSXZkN6cUKVgTr8iVqnWPsioWJHu4+GvXFmJucWr17m86dqbHTwGH X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:222069 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: Hi Lars, > Hm, yes; doing it via a traditional keymap would make more sense. (And > and should be bound by default, I think.) I can't recall > why I did it that way (if I was the one that did it). Hm... probably > just because it was easier since it defines those lambdas... For the time being I would be happy if the lambdas were transferred into functions, and if and were bound to the functions in parallel to M-n and M-p. Still hard-coded, yes. But you could postpone to customize it until there is further pressure from somebody else :-) Best regards, Michael.