From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15124: 24.2; comment indentation functions are messed up Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:16:40 -0500 Message-ID: <8737249s6f.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <874nan5j6u.fsf%stlman@poczta.fm> <49zjse4yza.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <521129C1.8020107@poczta.fm> <20130821210339.GA3790@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1518578134 15919 195.159.176.226 (14 Feb 2018 03:15:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 03:15:34 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.90 (gnu/linux) Cc: 15124@debbugs.gnu.org, Lukasz Stelmach To: Alan Mackenzie Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 14 04:15:30 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1elnXL-0002qm-PV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 04:15:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56029 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elnZN-0004Mq-LN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:17:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elnZF-0004MM-2i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elnZE-000611-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:17:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:34133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1elnZ8-0005yt-Sf; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:17:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1elnZ7-0003jw-UK; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:17:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 03:17:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15124 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15124-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15124.151857821014356 (code B ref 15124); Wed, 14 Feb 2018 03:17:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15124) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Feb 2018 03:16:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42030 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1elnYw-0003jN-3C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:16:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]:41973) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1elnYu-0003j4-82; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:16:48 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f4so23636887ioh.8; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 19:16:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=agsjle/ASGZT4C2lgpm60FNOXmd8TRBXuQNHD1+Og0c=; b=Z0qON+HAw8U0Ya29BiLzodKgf3LZIchBtFVlrNwE8BlZ0GNvATob4Wor5DzMEAxF+M jwa0QFrVgzYvKlIqyROUu4WF+Z0ZzlpnXszyzkfAOE7GxTd41weLUupz78hJBNvOe9q/ svDd5jsjX7HHD1wEmvDiXFEOPAdLIwox7yDOU7KWh38RW2QqYED3ZGh5tvLMWmoa0lT2 oY/P9QkiYhMnJUwx+gFfGSMM0NsE2U9S5rDWP5PTdu2q4Vs87EoBz5F2ihhCpvW02GQe NWDFwrIy1CetUI2aDzvdh+UrwMG8FyNRXAi8a8XNlPO7Thj6TERxlrXOmrnGUnFUqlC+ Bb3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=agsjle/ASGZT4C2lgpm60FNOXmd8TRBXuQNHD1+Og0c=; b=kN2qilLQGNC0zYiyVq4NXyAcVvomEI/y75p6k31GWN+Wb1RL5Ay/q8cDNiZfHsYVRN CKjend31fe/3UGmAYHongUBFkwDdgX5+7sF8ijcHRzSTRLYUPnV+rlxbp/EryMVvmf5Y tk6t4pQePtDQvtiDhRi4bE5msHxvDgU64xqmzpU0s6jR/oop3ZKeZFoVKKnDyCBNmdOJ EOqfnCZ432XJ2qwahga3kS0K3hqodlVosChvU+JFxEhnpxJp7elRpPLYd6ysaqyqD2nN 7FJd4YxCVt+fvmXrioHXVxiH3IyPYECgPFXrkNS+EoJ23qvqhmko4JoXYC/2iU1KQAFw kjsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBAS6DXRWCVa7OmnIh4EQ1lf6ptpC9wOA2R8suqg5pXugBEwFTV FDhbTPAi6lsM8XEC2IDbDluSFw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225Bq1rAEtkbfwtQpS1sSocyyyLcsosH/zW7mlUuVY2P1f6M7BzxS4NFJV2pIpozrEXxdgjfPg== X-Received: by 10.107.29.200 with SMTP id d191mr3784040iod.300.1518578202500; Tue, 13 Feb 2018 19:16:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id k66sm12676896itd.8.2018.02.13.19.16.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 13 Feb 2018 19:16:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130821210339.GA3790@acm.acm> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:03:39 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:143265 Archived-At: tags 15124 unreproducible close 15124 quit Alan Mackenzie writes: > I've fired up "emacs-24.2 -Q", created a new buffer "asdf.c", M-x c-mode. > >> Contrary to what the cc-mode info (4.4 Filling and Line breaking) says, >> M-j does not call c-indent-new-comment-line. This makes it impossible, >> like I wrote at the beginnig, to get " *" inserted automatically when >> pressing M-j to end a line when editing a comment. The result is: > > When I type in the text below, typing M-j where indicated, I get the > desired " *" on the next line. When I do C-h c M-j, I get told that M-j > is bound to `c-indent-new-comment-line'. Seems OP hasn't followed up, so there's no need to keep this open.