From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Using Org as the source format to generate org.texi Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:30:51 +0100 Organization: GNU Message-ID: <8737198p04.fsf@gnu.org> References: <878tb5axms.fsf@bzg.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1520595062 15832 195.159.176.226 (9 Mar 2018 11:31:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2018 11:31:02 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Richard Stallman Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 09 12:30:58 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1euGEi-0003x3-My for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 12:30:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44610 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euGGl-0003va-FZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:33:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euGEt-0003JZ-5l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:31:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euGEo-0005BM-R8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:31:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:55972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1euGEo-0005BI-Ne; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:31:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [78.192.157.63] (port=38552 helo=bzg.fr) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1euGEg-0006de-4J; Fri, 09 Mar 2018 06:30:54 -0500 Original-Received: by bzg.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8EB21380A60; Fri, 9 Mar 2018 12:30:51 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Wed, 07 Mar 2018 17:57:17 -0500") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:223537 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > If Org can convert manual.org into that, > then it is ok as a source file. Good. > Can Org express all the constructs of Texinfo? As far as I know, yes -- but we need to check this. > But I think 'manual.org' is the wrong name for it. > It isn't the one and only manual we distribute, and it > may not be the only one written in org. So > it should be 'org-manual.org', right? Agreed. I'm in favor of renaming it to org.org to stick to convention currently in use: [package-name].texi. If more manuals are to be written in Org, then having calc-manual.org, emacs-manual.org, etc. is redundant. -- Bastien