From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#37485: 27.0.50; C-m in describe-bindings Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:38:11 +0200 Message-ID: <8736gnb8mk.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87sgooroa4.fsf@gnus.org> <83k19zpwtx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="44938"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 37485@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 23 12:39:21 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCLkS-000BTO-Vq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:39:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54706 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCLkR-0001eQ-FU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:39:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iCLkH-0001eC-57 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:39:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCLkG-0000ZH-07 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iCLkE-0000Yq-Hm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCLkE-0004W1-B7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 37485 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 37485-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B37485.156923509817294 (code B ref 37485); Mon, 23 Sep 2019 10:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 37485) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Sep 2019 10:38:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCLjW-0004Us-Kp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:38:18 -0400 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]:60982) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iCLjU-0004Uj-C7 for 37485@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 06:38:16 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.202.86.getinternet.no ([84.212.202.86] helo=marnie) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iCLjQ-0005HG-80; Mon, 23 Sep 2019 12:38:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83k19zpwtx.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2019 05:31:38 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:166980 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> C-c RET b mml-attach-buffer >> C-c RET c Prefix Command >> >> I know that `C-m' and RET is the same key binding, but I also think that >> when this key is used as a prefix key, I don't think anybody has ever >> wanted that to be RET instead of `C-m'. > > It's a key you press, so I think it's a Good Thing that we use RET > here. I'm not sure I understand... Both RET and C-m are keys we press, but the intended (both mnemonic and ergonomic) key stroke here is `C-c C-m c' (etc) and not the awkward `C-c RET c'. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no