From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#35639: 27.0.50; tramp fails to use ssh on LibreCMC (no base64 encoder available, and not mentioned in tramp manual) Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 10:28:01 +0100 Message-ID: <8736czttjy.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20190509101938.GB1697@socrates.lan> <8736lnx27g.fsf@gmx.de> <1A3C3BED-4CEF-41AC-B82F-EBA7AC614E18@aleph0.info> <87pnoru77n.fsf@gmx.de> <20190509195218.GD1697@socrates.lan> <87bm0b2y6t.fsf@gmx.de> <87zhi78lvb.fsf@gmx.de> <20191014015024.GA32638@socrates.lan> <87sgnv7o5w.fsf@gmx.de> <87y2uxptn2.fsf@gmx.de> <20191230131225.GA10204@socrates.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="151278"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 35639@debbugs.gnu.org, Jeronimo Pellegrini To: Jeronimo Pellegrini Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 01 10:29:28 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1imaJk-000dC6-ID for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 10:29:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49610 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1imaJi-0005N5-KM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 04:29:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1imaJL-0005My-SX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 04:29:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imaJK-0000lE-PH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 04:29:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57886) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1imaJK-0000kV-LN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 04:29:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imaJK-0004Hk-HK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 04:29:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 35639 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 35639-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B35639.157787090516430 (code B ref 35639); Wed, 01 Jan 2020 09:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 35639) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Jan 2020 09:28:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35626 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imaIj-0004Gw-7F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 04:28:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:43973) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1imaIh-0004Gj-OM for 35639@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 04:28:24 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1577870886; bh=5snbT3uOqpqoLopnTjUQ/WORvya5Ncp3NC4lZGDwP1E=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=QkHN5+2Y6cyZlwZQQahQwDXvcb6Zek/LQM4Er3pbMEg0WeEaAS7mhAP0ZPgbnMosP BAK5zyXm3GGGeCDwIX1fry4pE65oQ3IBEpGkmAqAXFXBqIC4yRMRZZ4EuSI2e90/Qa eoe+R6rQ/Q3/x5n9kYFMssCj1LUFNXu5AmQeYSLc= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([212.86.59.161]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N2Dx8-1jjT4K2u0U-013iBm; Wed, 01 Jan 2020 10:28:06 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20191230131225.GA10204@socrates.lan> (Jeronimo Pellegrini's message of "Mon, 30 Dec 2019 10:12:25 -0300") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:wSUbH8I9znwXijlUcxBnHOv4XNzt3q0J3PlKqGjq4Ar0dVP+l9E VUM0UF1vVWP5Vy22iY+XOgbYCrTLYpoRLJwZI2H1ndW5uzCHOXrqh8LtNC3wqPiE6x12C/u PI/62dg6th/AfH6Hmd6o0p043BhyIy5jfscAJjRJwRvJCDfM3rNdLM+toxNOhclnn2UvoST A6ubT6QRyjVB+eYXWGujw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:AmUUrD+NfZg=:nruA+qYxL1xpbXpAyqEYmI xoBH3s2gKixLlUpM3wF6PGo58ije85+1RwLc3qzWrTRoDeV/WgdTpCBh8bNf8Ihwfopr18uis +7HbGx102k3j6JSvWt9vUqeHVuIwUNpfomARsCHrxphtYqDThy6V5yjLo5yhSU3c9QWws6IOY qzDLqbKoUs0W8mawFeK0V6icJVmXNxZCCPeYroIpPlOm5AA2JWlmGlHhxQnraS8nl30XKbKoM 0oRFq7zeMQpGK2P4R/h1ZcwZmhFcBbgFQyBGFAJDHbKAXsaG7X/X8DzLai3VYAYqXNw1hdxOn fAKJ0/qtiHQ+yRjwD9mOOUgBrEyqFtFeaujoswOo4eKMXxxw6Osw+JgZENULCMXwTdIcivOTj gtAiEdQZenkFYRw6/8vQfoXmP/YkKoR4Ux/VO4tLgmwS1ao4zLs+WUrZwOzOmGYp54+f5jOQ3 cJ+VCIqJ+ArAxIBRevpgOV0xZ5qG0HiG4zfCNB9C86A6Mn/I23IQdtSFzNUaTiWctsVqUpPJ0 jo0q5hP8jXME12XeJkM4IJNazqclfQRkOfuUTWoSm8sJPUbnGxUzruvPRHKvQf2XWbi2XhcQQ Ech2lOaE9VjzDMIJBIf63fx7Ied+nmFNZlkVZSJY1SSE47/jYaD+Wl0FViIJrmGWd0VNzHTYY c6FEHA7IXoXdtwq0PRzDxbWGyomr47v9imsVDxMO6uO4+mEYy3O1vjAb/KHdLE3uq6LVpckQZ p2gZBJA53cFzlwfv1GZINv54/Gz7Jw42AUeY4UEtzBr9ZDAckj5N1nvBLWDWHh2Kt1VJ+WSt X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:174027 Archived-At: Jeronimo Pellegrini writes: > Hi Michael, Hi Jeronimo, >> I would really like to have this solved in Emacs 27. If this is still >> stalled, I could try to implement a patch myself. WDYT? > > There have been some complications on the University side here, and > although we do have a plan and could make it work, it would probably tak= e > some more time (months, likely). I'll prepare a patch along the sketch I've shown in my message from 12 May. Since I have no access to an LibreCMC machine, I would give it to you for testing. Would this be OK? > I am sorry that I couldn't get things to work in a mre timely way, and > I hope this didn't cause much trouble. No, it doesn't. But it will be useful to sort this out, for the case you'll offer the next patch (which will be much appreciated). > Jeronimo Best regards, Michael.