From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42605: 28.0.50; File lines in find-dired buffers not updated Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:42:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87365a6izo.fsf@web.de> References: <87y2n2xb7r.fsf@web.de> <7e79b76f-fe7f-498e-8373-8eba0c25579d@default> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37815"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 42605@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 30 00:43:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1k0unJ-0009ik-OL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:43:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53336 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0unI-0002l6-Lw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:43:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0ums-0002l0-Ei for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:50624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k0ums-00053C-3W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0umr-0001fX-Um for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:43:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 42605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42605.15960625696397 (code B ref 42605); Wed, 29 Jul 2020 22:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jul 2020 22:42:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33937 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0umf-0001f7-Fn for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:42:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:55281) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1k0umd-0001et-Am for 42605@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jul 2020 18:42:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=web.de; s=dbaedf251592; t=1596062556; bh=vBIPqqbcixdg7RZruHJ4MIM5tKzO2DaolCqsI2JOk6w=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Y2ygSQm5naWJzkrg3FfU5FthFnoN6eBV77sFnbORHz4lUUp5dr2QldS4+W76xr0G6 gqYeI2pgjt+G7mjbS25TUu7Zc2diHWbrtSJdNhX/oD9k/01ikdZUMm1d/mmaun1/kM 02zO7rEOSd5uxcGWT83ZB4k1JffbbvRPa0Qymj40= X-UI-Sender-Class: c548c8c5-30a9-4db5-a2e7-cb6cb037b8f9 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.76.215.78]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0McWXI-1kIRdE1ul6-00HeD7; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 00:42:36 +0200 In-Reply-To: <7e79b76f-fe7f-498e-8373-8eba0c25579d@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Wed, 29 Jul 2020 14:53:36 -0700 (PDT)") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:Hv6oi/8U0laoBiNt9K8WSezRzcI5vNbWJWzSzFO0ixazYTJpjQ1 doB/UV4FtLu/ROMlZnYYkTEHgJyRhA5OtGrXDPEsLCvEob/DdVa8dqQZzxMFa4oBRoe2uLx f7Mgs3Ju0z44LDbPU0p3dcWz0p5z7sqDOBb8vzugeqkMCKR77Coa1qoLG1IU/kZKWOxs3MQ GN530Yc1ACPtg+bGzyQcw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:uA5YRPqe9Jk=:grrQOormERFjYWx7eZbMBu RR8LhBJrisWp5s7DEvOxXXQBeiqhr0Ct0W98IFfHLGHUzFYW9VxUseCOrcugLn+htl3NKXGz7 hySl354dHkhRw9W8yneaU5AKSWGaeXLHAHYixrsa1is73GjBSyrctgBvmI5gQxkgiWPsnc8Rd GdpgCsUkIsIR92/dhQa15MQ9PqzJJUKmwz8DW2v63NzFMn8SUtEnRqvNytJnyCDv0tlfPt8mX aheUvWvDiPX2x3Tcm9Pbhm/jrpt7yBclA67aQPgdbOD/sRzwM68GyP6n5KzviZCMYoYXfuaGl zwXeLq0S1aHp3IFvoCKZtonTrcgqD/PvBLhpxcG0G3zFj+k5miktK2LZPLwsDTrvLDQ0K2knG EIAXQ4Nr0gGWabPM60eAYwTfD851O311ikuAxDw/td/JV6Slc2aRhzdKIUEdPczAY8HC1j5Bv isUyH7GSgwqF8Jslyq8zkL1UcvXDhaIi2e7kKc9Q01XMvdPyX5JnWP1gTJB2f8/jmtqDM2tqT bzbUjDVeOWkoogs+/AgaBggSwFtTSdYh0GOelNcEB00xxBGTETYGg1YsjvchX0sNdpDDfLOPS eUC8sknxJryThvsYUPpaEXKENLB+yNeOvf7ECvqJ2FJZVDBvRpMgM5dA+mE/rUzzwhgY16y+M /7XceqCH+8MFArm26xyVCxjixMbs9FbMb1T7YDwDjEm/nVAEXrf0+o2K5SJgz7vZfi21sq+9J M8ywfNXEkjhjqrP6bEAwmSrTqpyUOr5z08Keew5r0Y51lgSDXFylCxi3Wqd5qub7Pv8ixFWU X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:183683 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > > OTOH, when I delete a file in a buffer, dired could be smart enough to > > guess that the current buffer does include the file. > > FWIW, I don't understand the last paragraph. What do > you mean by "delete a file in a buffer"? Do you mean > somehow delete a file (from disk) from a buffer that > is visiting it? Or delete it from a Dired buffer? > I'm guessing it's the latter, but in that case Dired > does do that, doesn't it? I hit D in the find-dired result buffer. Dired deletes the file but it's not removed from the buffer. > `find-dired' gives you a snapshot of what's on disk > at a given time. Dired does that too, but for Dired > there's an optional behavior of having its display > auto-revert, to pick up any disk changes when you > revisit the Dired buffer. > > Is that what you're requesting for `find-dired' too? > If so, should it be turned on by the same option, > `dired-auto-revert-buffer'? I can think that someone > might well want a different option for it. No, that's not what I want. That might be very slow, so it's no general solution. And also not necessary I think. Michael.