From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#47236: 28.0.50; ebdb-mua-pop-up bad interaction with gnus window configurations Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:20:05 -0700 Message-ID: <8735t2vu4q.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <877dm4y07x.fsf@gmail.com> <87zgz0jui2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87im2wqene.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r1gr188t.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <875yy2qp8t.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8btwnu0.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87sg12du8j.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22589"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: 47236@debbugs.gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:/+i7PxwXsJ8t+lCO2DDJDpLSaxE= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 28 18:23:37 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lxu2q-0005m2-S7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:23:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53636 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxu2p-0001ie-Sv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:23:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxu0M-0004kB-U9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40787) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxu0M-0000TP-JW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxu0M-0005WW-Ea for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <877dm4y07x.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Eric Abrahamsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 47236 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.162489722321106 (code B ref -1); Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2021 16:20:23 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52324 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxtzi-0005UL-LI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:20:22 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:59662) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lxtzh-0005UE-AI for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:20:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53496) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxtzh-0003aO-2V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:20:21 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:51196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lxtzf-0008OV-4O for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 12:20:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lxtzb-0001Bk-6A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2021 18:20:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:209064 Archived-At: Robert Pluim writes: >>>>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2021 16:01:43 -0700, Eric Abrahamsen said: > > Eric> Robert Pluim writes: > >>>>>>> On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 10:29:38 -0700, Eric Abrahamsen said: > >> > Eric> Do let me know if you've tried the new version (or if you're no longer > Eric> using EBDB!), and I will close this out. > >> > >> Sorry Eric, Iʼve been a bit busy. Iʼll see if I can get to this this > >> weekend. > > Eric> No rush at all! I'd just suspected you weren't using it anymore, in > Eric> which case I wouldn't wait :) > > Hmm, Iʼve got it working for the summary/article/group configurations, > but not for message. Iʼm getting > > gnus-configure--frame: Invalid buffer type: ebdb-message > > I think this means that you need to add something like the following > to ebdb-insinuate-mssage > > (when ebdb-message-window-configuration > (add-to-list 'gnus-window-to-buffer > (cons ebdb-message-window-configuration > (ebdb-message-buffer-name)))) Oh, I thought I had! I think I was gluing together the mail and message functions in my brain. > And maybe you need to add an ebdb-mail-window-configuration variable, > and use that instead of ebdb-message-window-configuration in > ebdb-insinuate-mail? I'm not sure that's necessary -- it's a bit weird to have the wrong name in there if you're using mail-mode, but it would only cause trouble if a user was using _both_ message-mode and mail-mode, and wanted separate *EBDB* buffers for each. I think this can safely do double duty. Thanks for the report, and the chance to clean up some dumb code.