From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Max Brieiev Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Would there be a drawback of using the same graphical toolkit on every platform? Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:53:55 +0200 Message-ID: <8735kcuxzg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bkz3pltw.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmnil4w0.fsf@yahoo.com> <87mtilk50t.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37363"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 21 15:03:56 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9IC-0009Z9-6q for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:03:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60712 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9IB-0002hk-7L for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:03:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9A6-0004Ca-Rn for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:55:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a00:1450:4864:20::12f] (port=38505 helo=mail-lf1-x12f.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nM9A4-0003bF-OY for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:55:34 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id w27so1031944lfa.5 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 05:55:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=79UfNbJBu9+DjSrLzv/HiKh5elkGeZy3uW3NYNhc4Tg=; b=GSVc1p/1iKrWbg3vG6Vn8Wm6roNxzq8JXj9ec1Q8tsSfAfcUb7Z4/e2MOiuaTDfMOe RiJ/mD9DgAOmpnwoTQhiJcZag9VRcgd1UZ6TCJcnE3b1q9BqOjyFHOMAT/OF8Dn3ssQT lTuHo4/u6/Jo7FDfKCfzKHY0+nVBsLxMf7sqeQG3UI05hTufq1t+YYLF9oRfcHWZYxIB WDoz17zCquewqvI/ziJS9yKdxx1SCRD3JpTUoF+wX0ymPpzMGGgXi9f6L9yDp8ALLfOO RKOEA0OyrL7GFdmuEuQxtY6dt1YbA8CGkPcraUEi95WtG7g5P6jR9bSbGRyV8GHmCsi7 bDEQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=79UfNbJBu9+DjSrLzv/HiKh5elkGeZy3uW3NYNhc4Tg=; b=L+v/BTINqAjM567ScIU/Z+VwJNQlV2yl6y1vJqwjzU8fZ0nCcDwlIBWt03Kr0VUkkK d9p4EK3xyFlnJNDt6uFZ2ha2E2M14pzpJcw+8GPRlKX+ddQnwpoxMH5NdhLF0ASlfxGb Fs6SYseY8S4cqW0vrMAW8GYAF+VkEyC/+4aVYNS4AqKbj99itrC/cwlrRraiqogKH+tD v4iHMut18nxIX1Zw7BtFqJNdMctGOLHxHDGzYOWKcs4vaTomvUWyrImB8nWTajPi1YFJ r1MAuhKSbT2cQtRkD5dNfs8QVymq5YUqVdpxn8r8L0A8ohMZAH/pv6+jrSAr91H5Fz54 XTgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Z3BmKwQ1EWrupMrXEEVvYEAdbrCGHBEyfHzm7QwaHBB8byN3q nkwfA1uOJ7u+vE5t2H8XB0H3yqD9pbs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/ajcjXtqMg+F/mPOZsVxDf/IbVkCg6KnmobZmLxMwYbtWcWvgNfuor+u8quhdLl2/Sa6qCw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:783:b0:443:ae8d:6eda with SMTP id x3-20020a056512078300b00443ae8d6edamr12955365lfr.153.1645451730316; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 05:55:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from thinkmax (host-176-37-1-68.b025.la.net.ua. [176.37.1.68]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i11sm1114300lfp.237.2022.02.21.05.55.29 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 21 Feb 2022 05:55:29 -0800 (PST) Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87mtilk50t.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:05:06 +0800") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a00:1450:4864:20::12f (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::12f; envelope-from=max.brieiev@gmail.com; helo=mail-lf1-x12f.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.659, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:136110 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > So we should limit our features to what GTK provides? Just to name a > few, that would entail removing support for multi-TTY, distinguishing > "C-S-u" from "C-u", controlling the size of scroll bars, reliable > control over frame size? > > If you want such an experience, by all means use the PGTK build. But > those features are important to many other people, so we cannot rely on > PGTK. >From what I have read in this thread, does it mean that `--with-pgtk` build is less featureful (more buggy?) than "non-pure" build? And as a consequence, does it mean that Emacs on Wayland is more quirky than on X, due to the "problems" with GTK?