From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "J.P." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#48598: 28.0.50; buffer-naming collisions involving bouncers in ERC Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 07:24:35 -0700 Message-ID: <8735i5nql8.fsf__37088.2689066761$1650637569$gmane$org@neverwas.me> References: <875yzakzvi.fsf@neverwas.me> <87bkxaeyuw.fsf@neverwas.me> <87zgkisetn.fsf@cassou.me> <87ee1ucvv3.fsf@neverwas.me> <87tuaqs9br.fsf__15054.4815858424$1650295523$gmane$org@cassou.me> <87k0bmbage.fsf@gmx.de> <878rrz268v.fsf@neverwas.me> <87czha3oc5.fsf_-_@gmx.de> <87v8v2o9l4.fsf@neverwas.me> <87k0bh31pt.fsf@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2909"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Damien Cassou , 48598@debbugs.gnu.org, Ted Zlatanov , emacs-erc@gnu.org, Sam Steingold To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 22 16:26:03 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nhuEU-0000WV-Nw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 16:26:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47828 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhuET-0004zj-N1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:26:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhuDX-0003aL-NR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60552) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nhuDW-0001aZ-AD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:25:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhuDW-0000K9-6T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:25:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "J.P." Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 48598 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 48598-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B48598.16506374901214 (code B ref 48598); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 48598) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Apr 2022 14:24:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54449 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhuDJ-0000JR-Ng for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:24:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-108-mta140.mxroute.com ([136.175.108.140]:39405) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nhuDH-0000JD-Tt for 48598@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Apr 2022 10:24:48 -0400 Original-Received: from filter006.mxroute.com ([140.82.40.27] 140.82.40.27.vultrusercontent.com) (Authenticated sender: mN4UYu2MZsgR) by mail-108-mta140.mxroute.com (ZoneMTA) with ESMTPSA id 18051a91c88000fe85.002 for <48598@debbugs.gnu.org> (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256); Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:24:39 +0000 X-Zone-Loop: 99f2c89f9bb9708a7e6a3689cf8c51c798e0fd5e0bed X-Originating-IP: [140.82.40.27] DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=neverwas.me ; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References: Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=J2IPWaGsbN9VlPX1AGozZAUd0lOsokFOMnZbOA+fgFE=; b=J+cSaLq98gcNJQiXJCdUMRKGLh 6nXe9i7qk0ROFDhqsL0hCNtUaCec41EnUe0PiiXnAzbCGJ0vI80Bpr8ApxG7W+NMFV1Lfj7sR26D8 q0isIOVwK6etbsny5UTJBoXH7fANLPgoGlyYJBFZ6l2iBq3ZJOS/GaQW83JveUrV3+lwT7P0BE8o3 cKO7kAP1HQeCwwv4FV1ho3g9RsaKGzs4fk72K5egoEQu28ShA95bCZUwQrpSHW28RVQqVHaqLIHoJ J7E4fRhHiC3VXimmyVv2I/4Fwvz0WUOVHuT593+hWngJNCN9X+JYMqEr8fKcuYbyTfArnyEOer8eb LQJaQZgQ==; In-Reply-To: <87k0bh31pt.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Fri, 22 Apr 2022 11:29:50 +0200") X-AuthUser: masked@neverwas.me X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:230437 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: > Indeed, that works, thanks. I've installed erc-5.4.1.48598.0.20220420.474, > which seems to be the most recent version. Unfortunately, it isn't > obvious what has changed wrt vanilla erc, so I must use ediff-directories. > > [...] > > Well, this is also good. But for analysis it might be better to read the > files with the patches applied. Thanks for being brave and taking a look. And you're right, of course: for sharing purposes, I really ought to keep a full copy of the entire emacs.git somewhere, with up-to-date branches for all my open bugs. >> What I meant to >> say was that from my reading of that doc string (basically the de facto >> compliance spec), a *back end* ignoring :max is fair game. But I think >> the way I wrote it gave the misleading impression I was saying fair game >> from the querying client's perspective. But regardless, the tramp >> examples are indeed helpful. So, thanks for those. > > I wouldn't call it fair game. With the Tramp examples you have seen, > that a :max property greater than 1 makes sense. True that. And (I believe) it likewise makes sense for ERC's needs. > Btw, there are further dficiencies. For example, I believe the pass > backend does not support the :create and :remove properties (last time > I've checked, it were only netrc and secret backends which do). But this > is perhaps not the most important problem. Hm... I hadn't thought to check but will keep those on my radar. > Could you provide the (changed) test files together with the erc > package? This makes it more simple to puzzle all changes together, > instead of accessing different web locations. I've added the tests to the (fake) ELPA package you installed earlier. Appreciate the counsel, as always. J.P.