From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Emacs 30.0 warning from `cl-pushnew' and `memql' Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:54:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87358zlgsy.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <878ritgaty.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87o7rprvia.fsf@web.de> <87zgb913fg.fsf@dataswamp.org> <87ilhveo2s.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35312"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:c0dRWZmXAwbTsrhw74pFaYWb1VI= Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 29 23:15:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pB1B5-0008zf-QV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 23:15:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pB1Aq-0002iZ-Uc; Thu, 29 Dec 2022 17:14:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pAXpR-0001db-KW for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 09:54:50 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pAXpP-0001TR-UE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 09:54:49 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pAXpM-0002vs-Rp for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2022 15:54:44 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 29 Dec 2022 17:14:47 -0500 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:142031 Archived-At: tomas wrote: >> I think the interpretation of the question "Could there be >> a better default comparison function?", in the sense that >> `eql' is a bit nicer than `eq' for specific value types, is >> valid, especially when considering that `cl-pushnew' is >> often used for configuration stuff or other purposes where >> speed is not crucial. > > I see. Well, that train has sailed (or something). > Backward compat (especially with user's brains) and things. But in a way it makes sense since if you write the code the right way for the same data, it works ... (require 'cl-lib) (let ((lst '()) (str "a") ) (cl-pushnew str lst) (cl-pushnew str lst) lst) ; ("a") (let ((lst '())) (cl-pushnew "a" lst) (cl-pushnew "a" lst) lst) ; ("a" "a") -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal