From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thierry Volpiatto Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Changes to make in elpa-packages file for nongnu elpa Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2023 06:01:48 +0000 Message-ID: <87350uawwd.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87r0oftgye.fsf@posteo.net> <87350vt1wz.fsf@posteo.net> <871qgen1ln.fsf@posteo.net> <87edke4mou.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="40151"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 08 08:09:56 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qTFum-000ADH-L0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 08:09:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTFts-00066F-Nc; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 02:09:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTFtr-000667-DG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 02:08:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qTFtp-0002Ku-GF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Aug 2023 02:08:59 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E24240028 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 08:08:54 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1691474934; bh=dL49C6V63PqYLHZ2NGx+bvbEDcs9W5BRsZ4W2sba6FU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=ZjTB0Edl8PwiTOOFWyPTuRaI8vreZxF8k5qPP1AZIrQGQB9W5nMvWBCVO2+DmgYLd ZRCPu5JVnyQf2UuMUYN/flw8ZzkgoIdNo/xHADmlb9x+Av1V1gEvqcrQ8xcex2czXf ypP/YdaOGwPYwDGjZPPSALRT+265noAxxqrIhLVtVc7X/0zh/pn31BXZf9Hb2UOZ3n ZjEmTC+SWsB8IKPy5xfZHBlQAaZkCx2OHhkB0O9siS7mWw2uqkznfMcX8ATH9LT5mP 3K0kYcpjWj4I4rCCaO2/NoyCVGB7W2rFgcBXdinaUvApgFJnnN7YgWxK8S4wJ2IX4L /XFjdaifyAfRg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RKjS43sCJz6txv; Tue, 8 Aug 2023 08:08:52 +0200 (CEST) In-reply-to: <87edke4mou.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=thievol@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308434 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ok I commited your changes with some corrections from my previous post, see below. Philip Kaludercic writes: > Thierry Volpiatto writes: > >> Philip Kaludercic writes: > (let ((beg (line-beginning-position)) > (end (point))) > + ;; Does it make sense to extend beyond END to allow completing > + ;; file names mid-string? > (list beg end #'completion-file-name-table > :exit-function (lambda (str _status) > (when (and (stringp str) > (eq (char-after) ?/)) > (delete-char -1)))))) Yes, we want to complete from bol to point: START and END delimit the text to complete (which should enclose point). COLLECTION is a completion table for completing that text, > - (let ((backup-by-copying t)) > + (let ((backup-by-copying t)) ;why is this bound? We want to backup by copying, not renaming, so ensure it is done by copying. =2D-=20 Thierry --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQHHBAEBCgAxFiEEI9twfRN7r3nig/xwDsVtFB0W75MFAmTR2/ITHHRoaWV2b2xA cG9zdGVvLm5ldAAKCRAOxW0UHRbvkx0qC/9KfbgRcd9+OITFJnxggVpA/GFarWQw CtiWY6uaFsmE00gQ8O1tqgg8uahDEWx6r+HiToPByO1cm8THWVKyJa9LuP9sp4YP cOmTv/z6TQHVl8wF6rdYxk0pb/1xym8/DelCN3hk/msYyVK4wBIUsVbgcPiSXId8 Wi0fo2WXMRbFVMEWC43VfC7pCVSgItGRqwz5wZZXxuIId1V+bfeHCpsM61Aleblp aVb2mHaaJsyhlBJo5lkXz3LIo/CBqhlAjAgvnhjadpchssAL5zOSq5jzUS+N9EEI jfjKBV165B5NWGSS2soSFf/8X1OF4O3fmrLRLm1+i2jw5qKu8id+JnjdxJ9zbt53 BuDWJtuhql0d5C9VIRSPg+/Rnz700V5jiE9q2GOCAk4ioRNTdN08CLLzS/E0rTMm Ka/JDBoEYIwsd2Isu4qoI5Tq8dyk+lXYyMW7MtS65gZA407e4nJzb7wPxAbfbLvD bZLpt99O/AHnBIOFJJeZnadWeoJMz6cIfK8= =nCPD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--