From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Package for NonGNU-ELPA: clojure-ts-mode Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2023 10:11:43 +0000 Message-ID: <8734zzv7vk.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87cyzrjbd8.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83zg2vav46.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7j99304.fsf@dfreeman.email> <87wmxj27fn.fsf@dfreeman.email> <831qfrptiq.fsf@gnu.org> <57429221-d9be-5791-e975-b3539905e2f6@gutov.dev> <83a5udlj47.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <87il90znco.fsf@yahoo.com> <1977fbef-307b-bcf4-9448-64f26916dd65@gutov.dev> <87edjozlqq.fsf@yahoo.com> <43ddad10-49dd-1c49-ebfe-51689780b315@gutov.dev> <83jztgk410.fsf@gnu.org> <83edjojx8c.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="12006"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Stefan Kangas , dmitry@gutov.dev, luangruo@yahoo.com, philipk@posteo.net, danny@dfreeman.email, emacs-devel@gnu.org, manuel.uberti@inventati.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 31 12:11:54 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qbeeX-0002xT-Ry for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:11:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbedy-0006mD-Cv; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:11:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbedw-0006m0-SQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:11:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qbedt-0004si-Ih for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 06:11:16 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B16BD24002B for ; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:11:10 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693476670; bh=uA3ywQdFm+Q/DfBje+M6E2AFybPpcl5icTc0Ymk2wEQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=EREEO1SOW/fluINHdwrO1HqUU1V9GH6jpAWjtcmou1AmOKvM2pMf2SY7A+beM4C1a Ia5GA3+kUWpcDojn9CPRLC8q7PX6qGN2A0sxD4/jHAJOwQ84Z/BsZjHs4uXB4vLbBR PpGVJH3vrvK7GMMqLpJr61npF/02+h9KfIroV+fWnmFWlMbJCOCvY0m8q8b/s5T9b/ 6JoX4uip3vN2ODE1IkP+21vOa+TaPnYRA9U2KYSulpls3GsAI4v+S70NLH6nuRZ5Yd m6BWpEPMLzr8neogiLb29rbKQx7f+XeeZzmSFxvcSwcwhsMNo4VN0lrlvMFQX2M8Ua dxfbmzISzLnJw== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4Rbxl128sVz9rxG; Thu, 31 Aug 2023 12:11:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <83edjojx8c.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309611 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> This seems to speak in favor of more frequent minor releases. > > I don't see how. We need to look for the reports about regressions in > the previous release, and when we think we have seen enough, make a > minor release. If feedback takes months to get to us, we either > release blind with the same regressions (about which we haven't heard > yet), or wait longer. Is there any downside holding on a minor release if _some_ bugs are already fixed, even if others are not yet? What I recently did for Org's bugfix releases was: 1. Every two weeks I see if some bug fixes landed on bugfix branch 2. If there are, I just tag a bugfix release Nothing major is ever landed on Org's bugfix (AFAIU, it is similar for Emacs' release branch), so it generally seems safe to do minor releases frequently. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at