From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen via "Emacs development discussions." Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Question regarding load-path handling for ELPA packages Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 23:04:03 +0200 Message-ID: <8734qede7w.fsf@web.de> References: <878r0ifjmt.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87eda0765g.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87o794z6l8.fsf@web.de> <87a5ko6s64.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87bk53cfo2.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Michael Heerdegen Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23201"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:CFTNcdAspCmU2xUfLICPCjZgA3Q= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 18 23:04:28 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s8REB-0005rA-Vb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 18 May 2024 23:04:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s8RDG-0002bQ-QY; Sat, 18 May 2024 17:03:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s8RDF-0002b2-6R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2024 17:03:29 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s8RDD-0007pQ-N4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2024 17:03:28 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s8RDA-0004QM-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 May 2024 23:03:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:319355 Archived-At: Michael Heerdegen via "Emacs development discussions." writes: > In case of AucTex I think you obviously should not do that. But you > asked. > > What are the concrete questions left you want to answer? How dh-elpa > could be improved or fixed to not omit the byte compilation of > subdirectories? Or, if you want to know how compilation when installing packages works: see `package-unpack' which calls `package--compile'. That function compiles all ELisp files including those in subdirectories (using `byte-recompile-directory') minus those matching one of the patterns specified in the packages ".elpaignore" file when it exists. Michael.