From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#75292: 31.0.50; igc: (file-error "Doing vfork" "Bad address") Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 18:44:45 +0000 Message-ID: <8734hu31lu.fsf@localhost> References: <87pll5qexm.fsf@localhost> <86zfk9hxje.fsf@gnu.org> <87h66hqcqh.fsf@localhost> <86ttahhv4m.fsf@gnu.org> <875xmxqa77.fsf@localhost> <86msg9hspa.fsf@gnu.org> <874j2h0wsa.fsf@localhost> <86cyh4j55c.fsf@gnu.org> <871pxjhjc1.fsf@localhost> <864j2fheva.fsf@gnu.org> <874j2efz19.fsf@localhost> <865xmud5jx.fsf@gnu.org> <87frlu34l5.fsf@localhost> <86ikqq4ioo.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15907"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 75292@debbugs.gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 07 19:43:20 2025 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tVEXv-0003xg-PO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 19:43:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVEXg-0004Hp-G8; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:43:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVEXe-0004Hf-O3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:43:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tVEXe-0002r0-Ca for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:43:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debbugs.gnu.org; s=debbugs-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:To:Subject; bh=cMqcuSUxmL6e4EuJfIgMS/If2wIssQwPwFvVhF8AaL4=; b=IAt+77TC/3rdUS9yCvCW0sTJiCBbdxtn2z5C65WrfHpaNMMm+kXZtBzVslA/VAYtv5F51jRKLW3jA70O4kqootOPtxVyNBycsNQ5iB2AcQ2PWnjM7Qx2IgsLD/a1YcxkjcxiCw6vHBZ/i/Yu5H9gBrIqWaDGRkIt6CeCH9R8dK0V95bNh0ijF1Nxywis+pu6uk5qo8gV0LWRXfxa6h+ahFIOMN2zTWX7bsJVc3CYZpgXeGG6A/X9wiGQqavtA3Mkds8GarErsB2yGAO1ofySpz6Idwqe3dj8Ds16xpnSsNj1hRaO4Uec4RnLSbyfTOKEMOmlscRpOqWqc2PmkI83zw==; Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVEXe-0007AO-0L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:43:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ihor Radchenko Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 18:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 75292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 75292-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B75292.173627535827494 (code B ref 75292); Tue, 07 Jan 2025 18:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 75292) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2025 18:42:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44657 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVEXG-00079M-0y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:42:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:32923) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1tVEXD-00078n-Qj for 75292@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2025 13:42:36 -0500 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 534EB240027 for <75292@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 19:42:27 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1736275348; bh=CxgVgzS8S/MY1kuBhN64PRgJCWgfld+X2Md0AGnYOw8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=V/tqfsFq0hfs/xieLn0zgGyVVwnpRmkwzlChkIN6kEPVjBixjiTBdAQRRpH1i09Bo HfM4AD0mfdg01s0PF1fui4m8GhiPcyjHHI9IUXvUWM9pbK0+jfMUhVYYZkUZDzQBjk BYVoxaQcO5GVvAUcUOFZOFH2m2OWRtMrhclh/5CZ7qIBs4CzmCIITQMMaysaPINyVS 7NXdqc/u4VFn6zqY1IQjY2k68p6eeCKV5iz457TSzUqsem5Ev+CjeTvuL4EH6S+E91 MgUSAmnOLtg+YA+LdJ8INEZPisQN7y61wMwoJhkJ1ifZcN0HziiYfZPZQMuW8JoeTX 52w4VJS4AhyEQ== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4YSKfT6Lcdz9rxF; Tue, 7 Jan 2025 19:42:25 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <86ikqq4ioo.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:298740 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I guess the next thing to try is to return to the posix_spawn build > after callproc.c is patched as discussed in bug#75322. Do I understand correctly that the patch is not yet finalized? -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at