From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: jmarant@free.fr (=?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ECB Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:29:31 +0200 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <871xjucfv8.fsf@marant.org> References: <40E5A52D.2000104@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1088800068 11213 80.91.224.253 (2 Jul 2004 20:27:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 20:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 02 22:27:41 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BgUdJ-0003RH-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:27:41 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BgUdI-00061n-00 for ; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 22:27:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BgUf8-00037S-5r for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:29:34 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BgUet-00034n-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:29:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BgUer-000337-30 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:29:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BgUeq-000331-UB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.4.17.105] (helo=mallaury.noc.nerim.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BgUcf-0000hg-HV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:27:01 -0400 Original-Received: from amboise (jmarant.net1.nerim.net [62.212.105.6]) by mallaury.noc.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934EA62DC1 for ; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 22:26:57 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by amboise (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C6D3A2C0F7; Fri, 2 Jul 2004 22:29:31 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <40E5A52D.2000104@gnu.org> (Jason Rumney's message of "Fri, 02 Jul 2004 19:10:53 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25400 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25400 Jason Rumney writes: > The biggest difference between ECB and speedbar is that speedbar > always appears in a seperate frame (it can be forced into another > frame, but it is not easy), whereas ECB has several layout options, > AFAIK all of which use windows within the current frame. Many people > are used to working in other programs within the same frame, so they > may see this as an improvement over speedbar. IIRC, ECB uses tree-widget, which has recently been added to the Emacs trunk. I think this is what you compare with speedbar. Cheers, --=20 J=E9r=F4me Marant