From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-trunk-diffs] Changes to emacs/lisp/faces.el Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:56:32 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <871xdrygm7.fsf@jurta.org> References: <87mzwsws3d.fsf@jurta.org> <41B6317B.6020303@esperanto.org> <41BC0D29.9020007@t-online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1103108881 7905 80.91.229.6 (15 Dec 2004 11:08:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 11:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Cc: occitan@esperanto.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 15 12:07:52 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CeX0a-0001K8-00 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:07:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CeXAl-0000f2-C6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:18:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CeX4z-0006Q2-11 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:12:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CeX4A-0005h9-01 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:11:34 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CeX3f-00057Z-Qv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 06:11:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.100] (helo=MXR-5.estpak.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CeWsi-0001tz-PU; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 05:59:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-32-18-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.32.18]) by MXR-5.estpak.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33056104267; Wed, 15 Dec 2004 12:59:29 +0200 (EET) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:32:23 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:31149 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:31149 Richard Stallman writes: > It applies to escape sequences, so I think the name fits. I will see > if the doc string should be changed. It applies not only to escape sequences, but also to control characters. So the name is too specific. A better name should indicate the purpose of the face, for instance, `warning' face. storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > I think this looks better too -- but the current escape-glyph face > doesn't stand out very much -- what about "red" foreground instead? "red" is too strong color and usually used to highlight errors. Better colors are "dark red" or even "OrangeRed3". -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/