From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: More about blink-cursor-mode Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:54:18 -0500 Message-ID: <871xb88zwg.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <200502200155.j1K1thb29289@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <200502220137.j1M1b3W19956@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1109081233 12746 80.91.229.2 (22 Feb 2005 14:07:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:07:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 22 15:07:12 2005 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D3agp-0006dp-Sw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:07:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D3axz-0005lk-Q7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:24:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D3axP-0005dp-29 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:24:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D3axD-0005Xk-TU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:24:01 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D3axD-0005Tx-Pf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:23:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.184] (helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D3aUT-00087I-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:54:18 -0500 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.68.218.40]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050222135417.EIBP1919.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:54:17 -0500 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1A99AD73DA; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:54:18 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200502220137.j1M1b3W19956@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:37:03 -0600 (CST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-MailScanner-To: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:33726 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:33726 > One _definitely_ does not want to rap a Custom standard expression in > a condition-case. > Well, unless the `condition-case' still fully makes sense after > startup, when the user chooses "Erase Customization" or "Show initial > Lisp expression" in a Custom buffer. Of course. That's a given. And since the expression has worked well unwrapped for a long time, wrapping it with condition-case would have *no (nasty) effect* except maybe at startup (i.e. when we might want it). Stefan