From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Problems with whole buffer Custom functions. Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:43:29 +0200 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <871wyzsogm.fsf@jurta.org> References: <200601130332.k0D3WKo16648@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87psmrr3vg.fsf@jurta.org> <200601170413.k0H4Do825655@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87acdp8jnv.fsf@jurta.org> <200601220155.k0M1tFQ01840@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137981419 22821 80.91.229.2 (23 Jan 2006 01:56:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 23 02:56:59 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0qwu-00067J-IM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:56:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0qzW-00083f-Iu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:59:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F0qyv-0007vX-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:58:57 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F0qyu-0007ur-1A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:58:56 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F0qyt-0007uk-To for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:58:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [194.126.101.111] (helo=mail.neti.ee) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1F0r3Y-0008Qs-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:03:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.neti.ee (80-235-32-219-dsl.mus.estpak.ee [80.235.32.219]) by Relayhost1.neti.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CA31B1D; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 03:56:04 +0200 (EET) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200601220155.k0M1tFQ01840@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:55:15 -0600 (CST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) (Debian) at neti.ee X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49425 Archived-At: > The appearance of the example buffers in this section is typically > different under a window system, since faces are then used to indicate > buttons and editable fields. BTW, since now links in customization buffers are blue, they can be confused with group and variable names which are blue as well. The only difference is that links are underlined, but names are bold. There is one comment in cus-edit.el before `defface custom-variable-tag': ;; When this was underlined blue, users confused it with a ;; Mosaic-style hyperlink... I don't know what appearance custom-variable-tag had before, but it still can be confused with links. Perhaps group and variable names should have a different color than blue? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/