From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: should search ring contain duplicates? Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 08:00:16 -0400 Message-ID: <871wvaknso.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <200605030727.k437R2Wx009975@amrm2.ics.uci.edu> <87bqufwbls.fsf@jurta.org> <85iromw09n.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1146744092 23291 80.91.229.2 (4 May 2006 12:01:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 12:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , dann@ics.uci.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 04 14:01:27 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FbcWA-0005fF-US for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 14:01:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FbcWA-0000Re-DT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 08:01:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FbcVT-000075-0z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 08:00:31 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FbcVN-0008Vh-AJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 08:00:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FbcVN-0008VT-3G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 May 2006 08:00:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.97] (helo=tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FbcVv-0003Jo-U0; Thu, 04 May 2006 08:01:00 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.55.147.184]) by tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060504120021.YQUV24981.tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Thu, 4 May 2006 08:00:21 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 47BBFD865D; Thu, 4 May 2006 08:00:16 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: <85iromw09n.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Thu, 04 May 2006 12:29:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:53892 Archived-At: > What is the rationale for making this a macro? It's not performance > relevant, and not short. 100% agreement. > Sure, you need to quote history in the call then, Big deal! Especially given that history variables are already quoted everywhere else they're used (i.e. in calls to read-*). Stefan