From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Default of jit-lock-stealth-time Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:05:35 +0900 Message-ID: <871wk1eucg.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <85tzxazb8r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85irdi1mar.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85abytkugj.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <85bqj8n24s.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1173229649 27038 80.91.229.12 (7 Mar 2007 01:07:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 01:07:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 07 02:07:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HOkck-0007MR-CB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 02:07:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOkcm-0000ds-Ay for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:07:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOkbK-0008Oa-Nr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:05:54 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HOkbJ-0008O1-4V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:05:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HOkbI-0008Nu-Ub for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:05:52 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp02.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.72]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HOkb1-00047S-AA; Tue, 06 Mar 2007 20:05:35 -0500 Original-Received: from 203-216-97-073.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.97.73] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1HOkay-0003ZF-Mg; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 10:05:32 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 345422F43; Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:05:35 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: <85bqj8n24s.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Sun\, 04 Mar 2007 22\:13\:23 +0100") Original-Lines: 19 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:67464 Archived-At: David Kastrup writes: >> If that's the standard texbook.tex from CTAN, I have it. FWIW, I >> don't see any special problem with it in "emacs -Q". JIT stealth >> still takes 1-3% of CPU on a 3GHz box, when this file is the only one >> loaded in a session. > > I get similar effects with other files (not just TeX files, C mode has > shown similar problems in some iterations), and if you had followed > the discussion closely, you'd have realized that several other > developers have disabled jit-lock-stealth-time previously for their > own problems using it. What OS do you use? How much memory you have? -Miles -- "Most attacks seem to take place at night, during a rainstorm, uphill, where four map sheets join." -- Anon. British Officer in WW I