From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Guerry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23.0.50; ielm doesn't handle comments Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:35:08 +0000 Message-ID: <871w7ekwjn.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <9c1b17790802131614p1f113873tbba17ec5af03c8ed@mail.gmail.com> <87k5l7mlpy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ve4rl337.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ir0rdpat.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87odai1ehu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203093350 26646 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2008 16:35:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lawrence Mitchell To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 15 17:36:13 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQ3XR-0001Yk-Pb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:35:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQ3Wx-0005z1-Jf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:35:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQ3Wt-0005y0-2v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:35:15 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQ3Wr-0005wR-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:35:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQ3Wq-0005wJ-Qe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:35:12 -0500 Original-Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.172]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQ3Wq-0003Uh-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:35:12 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so1369688ugf.48 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:35:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=SE2Rd08CSRupMpXUw26xcx/mzbtZ49G3TB3TIez3/RI=; b=MpNMtrKHxMZQZM0L+YqUrTn3nTeG1goO5oqYi7yfKtmGmUVuJGeJFMdxSXEYBc/I7i2RPkTeVp7sQzC6EfpGdnrmcj1jcMvAnzjsbUVKuPQh34YGZH/Mr7aMrDd1kQP9QaaHsiafR+TR3qj/308tjXfNOjF1Fd5e/SOVXa0feiQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=soC6GIeWdq0YqZvefOC/8ur+XkGu1UtLbFeWeuKJa8zY02ZwLeGAVk7wYSen1hzNqE314UdVKOHvCvoh8ZJiiyQajm125gasGHywVXZTRtFCvR7RwzfzNsXsLJ+OhmZJjz91ncpllfL0b5CdibEcVaMpQ7m4ztBkkx5DeJlEH50= Original-Received: by 10.66.249.8 with SMTP id w8mr1886189ugh.75.1203093311360; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:35:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [81.99.213.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 18sm17758977ugk.18.2008.02.15.08.35.09 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:35:10 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 83E221575BD; Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:35:08 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87odai1ehu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien Guerry's message of "Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:27:41 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89165 Archived-At: Bastien Guerry writes: >> I think the right way to fix this is to allow ielm to read the >> form as it currently does (using read-from-string) and then >> discard following input if it contains either merely whitespace >> (as is currently the case) or a comment. > > I will apply this with the ChangeLog you provided if you agree. Applied. -- Bastien