From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pgg-gpg.el - pgg-gpg-process-region timing problem Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 10:59:52 +0900 Message-ID: <871w2nmw2v.fsf@broken.deisui.org> References: <2cd46e7f0806221037h6d16839bp567eb5b901313375@mail.gmail.com> <87zlpc8t00.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87r6ao8rty.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <873an4b898.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214272818 28863 80.91.229.12 (24 Jun 2008 02:00:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 02:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: wilde@sha-bang.de, ken manheimer , emacs-devel To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 24 04:01:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KAxqA-0003cn-AR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:01:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34211 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAxpK-0004Wg-P5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:00:10 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAxpE-0004Ub-S5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:00:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KAxpB-0004Rg-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49067 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KAxpA-0004RU-SQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:00:00 -0400 Original-Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.250]:25421) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KAxp9-0003TP-IN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 21:59:59 -0400 Original-Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c38so601248ana.84 for ; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:59:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :sender; bh=ggDGBat4/NTsoEkH2MHD3x6fI26SW+6LEybmauWMVlo=; b=W/nlpvVYe1ntb01vIFkJuVNp41eIIxN/AXmVEQHu0svFXCFJtxwRcud12wy43yxUPU 6AdRSI2z6qiHgYSjfSiuIUxrZn0lgCWpMI7vvs4A17pMoJf8BGz+e52lqcccz1Ezia2m rAjQvdTVWGFy4abJN1dn1Id4V+WjPer+jXXA4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=N7WkhxXbZ4DnNbTuiLQji0YXgScrzUch6bAoyASbY+RzuQh2349CsJ/kiIyOSypWIH XMJrWPg7mVQJp1YRMg6loAnAdS/CZxONjRo9szf/MDYK4L5iayneq0y426mOu5hKFfn6 XcfeL3Q0D8zhodyU8w37hR1MCWG6W//k16v0s= Original-Received: by 10.100.121.12 with SMTP id t12mr14536523anc.132.1214272797761; Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from p360 ( [150.82.173.253]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q30sm11127430wrq.36.2008.06.23.18.59.55 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 23 Jun 2008 18:59:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <873an4b898.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Mon, 23 Jun 2008 15:17:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:99817 Archived-At: Please do NOT fix problems like this by guesswork. >>>>> In <873an4b898.fsf@ambire.localdomain> >>>>> Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote: > Delving into this, i got a little carried away... full func below. > This adds GOOD_PASSPHRASE checking (necessary for GNUPG 1.4.6, at > least) Really? I'm using 1.4.9 and it just exits immediately with BAD_PASSPHRASE. And besides, in the case --symmetric is given, (GOOD|BAD)_PASSPHRASE should not be issued IIUC. Perhaps you should first try to reproduce the exactly same problem as ken manheimer reported, though I can't reproduce it on my system. Regards, -- Daiki Ueno