From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: faster unicode character name completion Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:59:33 +0900 Message-ID: <871vj68bui.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <87einfbxdw.fsf@red-bean.com> <87fx7r68s4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87ws0yttoj.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1260237637 18261 80.91.229.12 (8 Dec 2009 02:00:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 02:00:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , Kenichi Handa , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 03:00:29 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NHpNM-0004UD-Up for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 03:00:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40036 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NHpNM-00068V-QB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 21:00:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHpMe-0005Vo-UJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:59:44 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NHpMb-0005SG-3m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:59:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59044 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NHpMa-0005SB-Qi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:59:40 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp12.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.74]:51207) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NHpMY-0000B8-4r; Mon, 07 Dec 2009 20:59:38 -0500 Original-Received: from 218.231.212.166.eo.eaccess.ne.jp ([218.231.212.166] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp12.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1NHpMU-0007Ju-GM; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 10:59:34 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 95780DF96; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:59:33 +0900 (JST) System-Type: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:42:30 -0500") Original-Lines: 19 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV GOL (outbound) X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118381 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> BTW, a related problem: it would be better to hide old obsolete Unicode >> names to not advertise them, but still allow completions on them. > > Note that for the code 0-31, it seems that the oldname is more useful > than the new one (which ssems to just be "" for all of them). > Not sure if there are others in the same situation. I've noticed that some of the old names use more common terminology, even if the new names are more consistent/logical/whatever. So maybe it'd be better to hide only old names that are specifically identified as being redundant. -Miles -- `To alcohol! The cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems' --Homer J. Simpson