Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes?

[Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>]

Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> writes:
>> Except that most experts on bzr I've read say rebasing is the wrong
>> way to go[1].
>
> Personally, and with all due respect, I don't consider this: "There
> are many theoretical objections to rebasing, and I won’t rehash them
> here. There’s general consensus that rebasing is sort of icky." as a
> sort of expert opinion, just biased. People used to git's rebase find
> it extremely useful.

Yup.  Rebasing rocks, especially interactive rebasing.

To be honest, a huge amount of bzr docs and commentary seems to be
essentially bzr apologia trying to compensate for technical failings in
bzr by saying "ok, so bzr doesn't do that as well as the competition,
but you didn't really want to do that anyway... trust us..."

-Miles

-- 
People who are more than casually interested in computers should have at
least some idea of what the underlying hardware is like.  Otherwise the
programs they write will be pretty weird.  -- Donald Knuth