From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:21:49 +0200 Message-ID: <871v8obqya.fsf@altern.org> References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <83lj6zz9o0.fsf@gnu.org> <87bp7setll.fsf@altern.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284982389 32684 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2010 11:33:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 11:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, lennart.borgman@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, drew.adams@oracle.com, miles@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 20 13:33:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxecN-0004Y0-0L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:33:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49721 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxecM-0004VN-E7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51774 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OxeRb-0000Ok-Fj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:22:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxeRX-0007WB-IS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:21:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:44840) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OxeRU-0007Vh-TH; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:21:53 -0400 Original-Received: by wyb36 with SMTP id 36so5460322wyb.0 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:21:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=TJYcQylMMAX2DE/EAB1qdWRn4NP0j5eSL4L4BWObhpA=; b=OQXrF80lKKU0FL/1U3KfBYCyy8o7FmSZsVGGg31ll8S4exYuY9Bw+hFFM4BBXbPNJI pvoDVo7G4LawKbPuAymQZvOiOHwc1e9/jXFYRfK/5Bs/rDagK5yDk1hErMVFAWuums8C jRdrCXhn6zhz6KaiBqiEMhxBQTn2fNX3x47uE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=LG2EUpzPlhjPFFiURIGhFIk1aok+pniqotX1vjhOtoeVWMSI2m9FSCfc6O73DIxbtY HY3G2uOBZluQTeWezWZO1gZwzb+C9FRJ+eDahxkN8/Ab1SnUyl4+wBtk5ts/yHG06OoS 3lai6bqbjT8VDZe5uNy+JKip/+mgz7wTp8Lxg= Original-Received: by 10.227.72.213 with SMTP id n21mr1738666wbj.66.1284981707710; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from myhost.localdomain (fon75-1-78-192-119-5.fbxo.proxad.net [78.192.119.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fz1sm1704277wbb.18.2010.09.20.04.21.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:21:46 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 53C323FA78; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 13:21:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:43:39 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:33:02 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130526 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> But besides that, is there any reason why no poll has been made so far? > > Because we know better without any polls? The problem is we all might have a different interpretation of "we". -- Bastien