From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Type-error in C code Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:00:42 +0100 Message-ID: <871v6p9eol.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289679048 15192 80.91.229.12 (13 Nov 2010 20:10:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 20:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 13 21:10:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PHMQr-0003Y0-Q1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:10:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55945 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHMQr-0008IM-8G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:10:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54901 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PHMHn-00046o-AI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:01:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHMHK-0006uS-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:01:19 -0500 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174]:44516 helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PHMHJ-0006tc-UA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 15:00:50 -0500 Original-Received: by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id 90FDD5C1D3; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:00:46 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:2e39:e900:222:faff:fe9d:ce44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FD5C5C1A6; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:00:43 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from jd by keller.adm.naquadah.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PHMHC-0008W0-7Y; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 21:00:42 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: Andreas Schwab , Stefan Monnier , Jan =?utf-8?Q?Dj=C3=A4rv?= , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Fri, 12 Nov 2010 19:45:57 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132607 Archived-At: On Fri, Nov 12 2010, Andreas Schwab wrote: > I think we should remove the union Lisp_Object, and instead define a > struct Lisp_Object { EMACS_INT i; } (reusing the macros of the non-union > type), and make that the default Lisp_Object at least during > development. I can't think of a good reason not to do that. Is there one? --=20 Julien Danjou // =E1=90=B0 http://julien.danjou.info