From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Sieger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-20101122 windows binaries Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:01:00 -0500 Message-ID: <871v6cjagz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8762vpj9ep.fsf@gmail.com> <87d3pwt759.fsf@home.jasonrumney.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290528103 3467 80.91.229.12 (23 Nov 2010 16:01:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:01:43 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 23 17:01:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKvJK-0005Zv-U7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:01:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59636 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKvJK-0006RP-N5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:01:38 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36885 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PKvJ5-0006PV-VT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKvIs-0001kP-Cr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:01:23 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:48643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PKvIs-0001kG-68 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:01:10 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PKvIp-0005JA-Hg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:01:07 +0100 Original-Received: from pool-70-18-205-205.ny325.east.verizon.net ([70.18.205.205]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:01:07 +0100 Original-Received: from sean.sieger by pool-70-18-205-205.ny325.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:01:07 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-70-18-205-205.ny325.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TCOu2NSCyWcQf1IZOsF/lccZbpc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133057 Archived-At: Jason Rumney writes: I guess no debug info has been included (probably not a good idea for snapshots). My bad: - Snapshots should or should not include debug info? - Pretests should or should not include debug info? - Releases should or should not include debug info?