From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Next pretest Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:18:04 -0500 Message-ID: <871v3yt81v.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87aair7163.fsf@stupidchicken.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296198092 3143 80.91.229.12 (28 Jan 2011 07:01:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 07:01:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 28 08:01:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiiKi-0004OR-OS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:01:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44887 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiiKh-0000m3-EP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:01:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57399 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiiKG-0000a0-Cn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:01:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiiJu-0005O5-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:00:56 -0500 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.147]:50257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiiJX-0005FV-Sa; Fri, 28 Jan 2011 02:00:11 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014143.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.143]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-06.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p0RKI511025693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 12AB316041A; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:18:04 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:58:31 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.147 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 130.132.50.147 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135118 Archived-At: Dan Nicolaescu writes: > Chong Yidong writes: > >> If you see any other bug that you think should be a release blocker, >> please point it out. > > Can we uncomment the #define NO_ARG_ARRAY line in src/s/intel386.h? > We got rid of NO_ARG_ARRAY in emacs-24, that file is the only one that > still enables it in 23.3. This is just a bug waiting to happen as > compilers get smarter... Since no problems have been reported since you removed NO_ARG_ARRAY on the trunk in April, I guess it should be safe. And it would fix Bug#7186. Go ahead.