From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9031: Installed rest of patch Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:44:56 -0400 Message-ID: <871uxvo64n.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4E17F5F8.7060200@cs.ucla.edu> <4E1936D7.4030302@cs.ucla.edu> <4E1B3224.5050804@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1310489901 17084 80.91.229.12 (12 Jul 2011 16:58:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 16:58:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9031@debbugs.gnu.org, Paul Eggert To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 12 18:58:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QggHl-0001Xz-Fb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 18:58:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57897 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QggHk-00016k-9y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 12:58:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgf9z-0007Br-2F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:46:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgf9v-0001bf-Ng for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39952) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgf9v-0001bb-Cs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:46:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgf9t-0004Cq-Tr; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:46:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9031 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 9031-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9031.131048551216106 (code B ref 9031); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9031) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2011 15:45:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgf95-0004Bj-Kc for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:45:11 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.143]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qgf93-0004BX-MK for 9031@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:45:10 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014025.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6CFiuh1021495 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:44:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:07:20 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.143 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:46:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48748 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > But... a formal announcemente about which state are we just now and > when do we expect to release the first pretest tarball would > be welcome. That depends on the bidi changes.