From: Olaf Dietsche <olaf+list.orgmode@olafdietsche.de>
To: Olaf Dietsche <olaf+list.orgmode@olafdietsche.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Tommy Kelly <tommy.kelly@verilab.com>
Subject: Re: Journal versus clock tables: Opposing requirements?
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:01:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871usxch80.fsf@rat.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hb1ttvoo.fsf@pinto.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Thu, 24 Nov 2011 14:57:27 +0000")
Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> Olaf Dietsche <olaf+list.orgmode@olafdietsche.de> writes:
>
>> Tommy Kelly <tommy.kelly@verilab.com> writes:
>>
>>>> OK, that might be what I need then. I thought clock tables grouped
>>>> things by headings, not by tags. I'll have a look at the manual.
>
> [...]
>
>> #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 2 :scope file :tags "health"
>> Clock summary at [2011-11-08 Di 09:57]
>>
>> | Headline | Time |
>> |--------------+--------|
>> | *Total time* | *0:20* |
>> |--------------+--------|
>> | Exercises | 0:20 |
>> #+END: clocktable
>
> I've lost the rest of this thread and I don't actually know who to
> attribute the original statement above...
Do you mean
<http://www.mail-archive.com/emacs-orgmode@gnu.org/msg48633.html>?
> In any case, I would like to have entries in the clock report by tag as
> opposed to headline (as alluded to above). Is this actually possible?
> My logging approach is to have descriptive headings (the specific task
> undertaken) with tags indicating the type of activity (teaching,
> research, admin, personal). I need a breakdown of my time spent in each
> category in one table.
>
> I realise I can do N tables, one for each tag, but this is not
> particularly useful for me. It'll do but if there's a nicer solution,
> I'll take it!
>
> The documentation refers to a :formatter entry, but I am not sure
> whether this is relevant as it says that this is for formatting an
> entry. My problem is that I want tag based entries, not how they are
> formatted?
>
> Apologies if I've missed something obvious in the manual!
Regards, Olaf
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-07 8:31 Journal versus clock tables: Opposing requirements? Tommy Kelly
2011-11-07 11:27 ` Bernt Hansen
2011-11-07 14:55 ` Tommy Kelly
2011-11-08 3:21 ` Bernt Hansen
2011-11-08 8:06 ` Tommy Kelly
2011-11-08 8:23 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-11-08 12:28 ` Bernt Hansen
2011-11-08 17:07 ` Bernt Hansen
2011-11-07 11:38 ` Olaf Dietsche
2011-11-07 14:51 ` Tommy Kelly
2011-11-07 17:19 ` Tommy Kelly
2011-11-08 9:04 ` Olaf Dietsche
2011-11-08 9:54 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-11-08 9:55 ` Tommy Kelly
2011-11-08 10:00 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-11-08 10:05 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-11-08 10:15 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-11-08 10:33 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-11-08 10:41 ` Tommy Kelly
2011-11-24 14:57 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-11-24 22:01 ` Olaf Dietsche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871usxch80.fsf@rat.lan \
--to=olaf+list.orgmode@olafdietsche.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=tommy.kelly@verilab.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.