From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10751: 24.0.93; BCC in Gnus isn't working Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:47:12 +0100 Message-ID: <871uq6s4db.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87fwemnbft.fsf@escher.home> <87wr7yl4os.fsf@escher.home> <1wzkcubaen.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328651291 10148 80.91.229.3 (7 Feb 2012 21:48:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 21:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10751@debbugs.gnu.org, Stephen Berman To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 07 22:48:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RustV-0007Jc-6w for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:48:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50781 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RustU-0003jN-QE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:48:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38431) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RustR-0003j3-R5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:48:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RustQ-0005aK-Mf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:48:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:55893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RustQ-0005aF-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:48:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RusuM-0001PU-1Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10751 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 10751-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10751.13286513005356 (code B ref 10751); Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10751) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Feb 2012 21:48:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59516 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rustf-0001OL-HT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:48:20 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58029) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rustd-0001OE-Rd for 10751@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:48:18 -0500 Original-Received: from 93-41-188-50.ip82.fastwebnet.it ([93.41.188.50] helo=rusty) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Russb-0005eI-RL; Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:47:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1wzkcubaen.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:28:48 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130002 (Ma Gnus v0.2) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1Russb-0005eI-RL MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1329256034.07326@3mLdn0mqNzO19PvjL2E1xA X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56681 Archived-At: Glenn Morris writes: > But having written that I looked it up and apparently there's no > guarantee it will work that way. That's the way all mail user agents I know of interpret the Bcc header. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome