From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12203: 24.1.50; *grep* buffer for grep over TRAMP contains shell prompt Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:26:11 +0200 Message-ID: <871uj7xsho.fsf@gmx.de> References: <87has4paa0.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345098449 22340 80.91.229.3 (16 Aug 2012 06:27:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:27:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12203@debbugs.gnu.org To: Matt McClure Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Aug 16 08:27:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T1tYG-0002T7-7k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 08:27:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44872 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1tYE-0002aB-Q8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:27:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48635) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1tYB-0002Wq-RE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:27:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1tY3-0000L1-Hh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:27:23 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:50692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T1tY3-0000Kg-CA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:27:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1tgY-0002iO-1v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12203 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12203-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12203.134509891010366 (code B ref 12203); Thu, 16 Aug 2012 06:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12203) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Aug 2012 06:35:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60235 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1tfe-0002h6-1l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.23]:40955) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1T1tfb-0002gw-9Z for 12203@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Aug 2012 02:35:04 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2012 06:26:14 -0000 Original-Received: from p57BB963E.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO detlef.gmx.de) [87.187.150.62] by mail.gmx.net (mp029) with SMTP; 16 Aug 2012 08:26:14 +0200 X-Authenticated: #3708877 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+QUTwUnSiQnSofSkz82bmAG9uU2lr/3gnGLIR9io oCj3ZHCooUMHFw In-Reply-To: (Matt McClure's message of "Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:15:18 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:63216 Matt McClure writes: >> There's no simple fix, because some `start-file-process' invocations >> do appreciate a prompt. Maybe we shall check, whether the process is >> still alive. If it isn't, the prompt should be suppressed. > > In case it's an easier change, if there were a newline after the > prompt it wouldn't break navigation to the first match. That could help for grep. But there are other use cases like "M-x shell", which require a proper prompt. I'm looking for a general solution. Best regards, Michael.