From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam Steingold Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Conf Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:40:37 -0500 Organization: disorganization Message-ID: <871uewqkka.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vcc8phw8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Reply-To: sds@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1355265906 8911 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2012 22:45:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 22:45:06 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 11 23:45:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYZh-0003FB-7h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:45:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33013 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYZU-0006PE-Kh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:45:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYZP-0006Nl-1y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:45:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYZL-0005Wu-IZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:44:58 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYZL-0005Wn-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 17:44:55 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TiYZU-00032i-Jw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:45:04 +0100 Original-Received: from 74.113.160.197 ([74.113.160.197]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:45:04 +0100 Original-Received: from sds by 74.113.160.197 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:45:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 74.113.160.197 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Attribution: Sam X-Disclaimer: You should not expect anyone to agree with me. Cancel-Lock: sha1:YnYbPQk1GO7dgbiKdxDnm0lAg6I= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:155494 Archived-At: > * Glenn Morris [2012-12-11 15:49:33 -0500]: > > Aleksandar Simic wrote: > >> Let me see what response I get back from the people that wish to speak >> and take it from there. I'll update the list in a day or two with the >> progress. If this is not desired (as in, inappropriate for this list), >> please let me know, as I don't wish to step on any toes. > > I'll bite and say that I don't see why an Emacs user conference should > be discussed on the development mailing list (rather than the user > mailing list). I don't necessarily disagree with you, but I will bite too: because chances are the speakers will be the developers. :-) -- Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) X 11.0.11103000 http://www.childpsy.net/ http://thereligionofpeace.com http://jihadwatch.org http://dhimmi.com http://iris.org.il http://memri.org Those, who refuse to do the math, are doomed to talk nonsense.