From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Prefer Mercurial instead of git Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2014 18:30:21 -0600 Message-ID: <871u0m2bqa.fsf@floss.red-bean.com> References: <1388785952.11337.16.camel@Iris> <3166302.gI3LmCZv1L@descartes> <1388853707.11337.27.camel@Iris> <87zjnby4nu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <1388862282.11337.31.camel@Iris> <87bnzr8s03.fsf@wanadoo.es> <831u0mv1mw.fsf@gnu.org> <87txdi74mc.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83ppo6tkjx.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnzqge8g.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388968247 24618 80.91.229.3 (6 Jan 2014 00:30:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 00:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Rostislav Svoboda Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 06 01:30:52 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzy5f-0005C1-7f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 01:30:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59965 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzy5e-0000mL-Mw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:30:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59507) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzy5T-0000m4-Kq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:30:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzy5K-0005DD-UR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:30:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]:52686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vzy5K-0005D3-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 19:30:26 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id j1so5859058iga.2 for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 16:30:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=nPrU+KzZXBmWKggg2oMt42G2HBUtE1TWUXJH9C6xMo0=; b=V2n69N3SBUFlLyHVLqlbHVmM+6pe3t1BD5nbnH9f7q/bpFN3luU5h4IjPwx1ReugII DsWZJA2Lm96YNRT82o9b+hCRuYrWjH5T0PPWhzEvLTGD8efUAvD53AQ+/QVYa/xTTFF4 eWqkUWV5l4zWQyTpXvxZdCbSkmQnynqMQ9PTUDjxlVmnY53JTBdlGED4GLpAgPjYKMK+ XDcPBhiXU0UPeoyfbbf6XpJRDxeGafWJolku5IAgE8X6k37lT3QAPmGyh4Ymk15QjQim R8AHBtDPdWp2MfFx3NvT2OmK2dUXGGayc7bMksYCUjaipjYyzNRvi/f5exAD1aHRWrTJ mwzg== X-Received: by 10.50.8.67 with SMTP id p3mr15800096iga.6.1388968225939; Sun, 05 Jan 2014 16:30:25 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from floss.red-bean.com ([71.23.151.134]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fk5sm11837057igb.9.2014.01.05.16.30.22 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Jan 2014 16:30:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Rostislav Svoboda's message of "Mon, 6 Jan 2014 01:21:00 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167420 Archived-At: Rostislav Svoboda writes: >Is anybody out there able to convert this "git vs. hg" discussion from >feelings into numbers? I've been saving all the messages, and would have bothered to count if it weren't so obviously leaning heavily toward git (I've been keeping an informal count as I see the messages go by). If someone really feels we need the numbers, they are in the archives -- "just add labor" :-). But most people seem to be talking as though git is already the obvious winner, and I think they're doing that based on the same informal count. -K