From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15974: 24.3.50; emacs -Q -nw: awful color for input fields: BRIGHT YELLOW Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 02:24:30 -0800 Message-ID: <871tzdvr4x.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <4f10904c-6fb1-470f-a2fd-0032209f80dc@default> <87iosq9u55.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83zjm2vuk1.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1391855176 26910 80.91.229.3 (8 Feb 2014 10:26:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2014 10:26:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15974@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 08 11:26:23 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WC578-0005KJ-Ql for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:26:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46021 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC578-0004vP-DH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:22 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54308) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56v-0004n6-3C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56o-0002fY-R1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56o-0002fU-NQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56o-0001fs-13 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:26:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15974 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15974-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15974.13918551616429 (code B ref 15974); Sat, 08 Feb 2014 10:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15974) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Feb 2014 10:26:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56474 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56m-0001fc-Fh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:26:00 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:40596) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56f-0001fP-NQ for 15974@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 05:25:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [204.14.154.233] (helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1WC56R-0000tW-Jq; Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:25:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83zjm2vuk1.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 08 Feb 2014 11:10:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13001 (Ma Gnus v0.10) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1WC56R-0000tW-Jq MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1392459940.12518@Rpcw47I4EMlDS0XCViPwSQ X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:84930 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> It does look kinda stark, yes. Is this only with -nw? > > Did you (Lars) succeed in reproducing this display? Because I > couldn't. A recipe for reproducing this would go a long way towards > resolving this issue, one way or another. No, I was not able to reproduce it. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/