From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Richard Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17007: 24.3.50; describe-key/function evaluates documentation function in the wrong buffer Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:45:21 +0100 Message-ID: <871ty2xt7y.fsf@yahoo.fr> References: <5322E8C0.5020106@gmx.at> <5323137D.2020103@gmx.at> <87txb0g6r7.fsf@yahoo.fr> <532576A7.6090600@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394970375 23173 80.91.229.3 (16 Mar 2014 11:46:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 11:46:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Nicolas Richard , 17007@debbugs.gnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_?= =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=A1vora?= To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 16 12:46:22 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WP9WG-0002y9-Jv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 12:46:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52949 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WP9WG-0007md-1x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:46:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WP9W8-0007gz-Ad for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WP9Vy-0002vZ-Oj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:46:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:36785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WP9Vy-0002vT-L0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:46:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WP9Vx-0003UL-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:46:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Richard Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 11:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17007 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17007-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17007.139497032713358 (code B ref 17007); Sun, 16 Mar 2014 11:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17007) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Mar 2014 11:45:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37967 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WP9VO-0003TN-J0 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:45:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be ([195.238.6.51]:17504) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WP9VL-0003TB-Jp for 17007@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 07:45:24 -0400 X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes Original-Received: from 220.177-178-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO LDLC-portable) ([91.178.177.220]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2014 12:45:22 +0100 In-Reply-To: <532576A7.6090600@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Sun, 16 Mar 2014 11:02:15 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:86893 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: >> The 24.3 version of with-help-window used with-output-to-temp-buffer >> AFAICT. > > I have tried to fix all problems I found in this area. If you have some > spare time could you please try to give the new `with-help-window' and > `with-temp-buffer-window' code some checking? After all, you were the > one who detected the inconsistency that was the root of all evil here > and I trust that you could detect any remaining inconsistencies as well. The fact that I found an inconsistency in the first place is because I'm not a heavy user of that kind of code, hence I relied on the docstring. Of course I'll report anything that I find, but I don't expect much from myself. Thanks for your fixes. -- Nico.