From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17882: 24.3; *Backtrace* buffer appearing in the wrong frame Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:00:26 +0200 Message-ID: <871tu64cbp.fsf@web.de> References: <10176744.CSMpqoKfbG@toomas> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1404144150 6587 80.91.229.3 (30 Jun 2014 16:02:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17882@debbugs.gnu.org To: Toomas Rosin Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 30 18:02:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X1e28-0001Un-PX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:02:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1e28-0005ti-Et for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45545) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1e0z-0003tm-Ay for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:01:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1e0s-0003it-CY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:01:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46944) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X1e0s-0003ip-AK for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:01:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1e0r-00039Y-SW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:01:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Heerdegen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17882 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 17882-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B17882.140414405212093 (code B ref 17882); Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 17882) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2014 16:00:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38094 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1e0e-00038s-2j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:00:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:55089) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1X1e0X-00038a-OZ for 17882@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 12:00:46 -0400 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([94.217.127.201]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlnQO-1WSJBb1w6i-00ZM0j; Mon, 30 Jun 2014 18:00:27 +0200 In-Reply-To: <10176744.CSMpqoKfbG@toomas> (Toomas Rosin's message of "Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:11:20 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.92 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gCfoRInp+RtRGB40Ir/izOZqzQVtPtWOw0NnDN50fajPU5vnTIB 4B/SOeqX4wOJijgVAtb3DRnPONDfVr1iCdZzqeWKCdo2hkumRO8zof22IehTuu9Kwf0WmtV Z1xJ98k1zF+IAxVetj2g62b2R4I7edgDCFjuMVBOBaD5D91HnsRyAY6GrPj1T1Al501g4sf g+hKB2cTUzjkhatu/wm7Q== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:91009 Archived-At: Toomas Rosin writes: > > What you see is probably an annoying consequence of the related fix. > > I suggest to make a bug report. Thanks, Toomas. I think the debugger is now too strict about reusing the last used window. `debug` prefers the remembered `debugger-previous-window`. AFAIK, this variable is never unset, so the debugger tries to reuse the last used window even when the last debugging session was over for hours. This is a problem when that window is still existing, but not "reachable" (say, on another display). This is the relevant code in `debug`: (pop-to-buffer debugger-buffer `((display-buffer-reuse-window display-buffer-in-previous-window) . (,(when debugger-previous-window `(previous-window . ,debugger-previous-window))))) Should we add a test whether `debugger-previous-window`s frame fulfills (lambda (frame) (eq t (frame-visible-p frame))) ? Thanks, Michael.