From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: something.tex changed on disk; really edit the buffer? Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:42:17 +0200 Organization: The Church of Emacs Message-ID: <871tq73fx2.fsf@vsl28t2g.ww011> References: <52d9ecfe-e978-4974-b1ae-2df1f5ed7ac0@googlegroups.com> <878ukpcf2p.fsf@vsl28t2g.ww011> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1413492187 26076 80.91.229.3 (16 Oct 2014 20:43:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:43:07 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 16 22:43:00 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xersx-0007Fp-RJ for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:42:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53169 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xersx-0000bX-GB for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:42:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47752) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xersc-0000aD-3z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:42:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XersW-00023j-81 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:42:38 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:58663) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XersW-00023X-1a for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 16:42:32 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XersT-0006uI-Ew for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:42:29 +0200 Original-Received: from p57acd4e9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.172.212.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:42:29 +0200 Original-Received: from dieter by p57acd4e9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 22:42:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 35 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p57acd4e9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/4jkFumK5TZ4P0WgZCbdEZfO3us= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:100467 Archived-At: dieter@duenenhof-wilhelm.de (H. Dieter Wilhelm) writes: > agjf.tucker@gmail.com writes: > >> Hi! >> >> I am using Aquamacs with AUCTeX and Skim to edit and view LaTeX >> documents. It used to work just fine but when I upgraded to version >> 3.0a (based on Emacs 24), I started to get these sorts of messages. >> >> Specifically, I will have run LaTeX using the button at the top. Then >> I will try to start editing again. >> >> At the bottom of the frame I will get my first message, "Something.tex >> changed on disk; really edit the buffer? (y,n,r or C-h)" I press "y" >> to keep editing. > > For you information: By coincidence I'm getting lately the same messages > persistently on RHEL (the Oracle version) with Emacs 24.3.93. (for some > local files). > > Before this I never experienced spurious notifications from Emacs, so I > thought this might be an OS problem, I'll test after my holidays Emacs23 > with the very same files and come back to this thread when I'm able to > reproduce a difference with Emacs 24.3.9{3,4}. We had a problem with the file server, this seems to be the most likely culprit and not Emacs at the moment from my side. Dieter -- Best wishes H. Dieter Wilhelm Darmstadt, Germany