I fixed all the byte-compile warnings, added an alias for `reverse', and
improved `seq-doseq'.

Stefan, can you have another look at seq-doseq?

Cheers,
Nico

Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:

>>>> The macro could use to "dolist" if the sequence is a list.
>>> But you'd then duplicate the code of the body, which could be
>>> problematic, especially with nested seq-doseq loops.
>> Oh, right! Another way would be to use a function, but I tried to avoid
>> that. Do you have a better idea in mind?
>
> You can change your `i' to be either an integer (for arrays) or a cons
> cell (for lists).  That requires an extra "is it a list?" test at each
> iteration of the loop (to know how to extract the element and to
> "increment" i), but I think it's the best we can do.
>
>
>         Stefan

-- 
Nicolas Petton
http://nicolas-petton.fr