Stefan Monnier writes: >> Something like the patch below seems to work (and it generalizes >> map-put to accept for MAP not only symbols but any "lvalue"). It also >> tightens the code generated by map--dispatch. But you have completely removed `map-put' here, right? Is it supposed to be implemented in terms of `map-elt' now that it is "set-able"? Nico -- Nicolas Petton http://nicolas-petton.fr