Paul Eggert writes: > Nicolas Petton wrote: >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >>> That's easy to fix, no? >> >> Yes, but I thought that this check must be there for a reason... > > I put it there because I thought it'd be a pain if everybody updated their > ChangeLog.2 files in their own branches and then tried to merge the results by > hand. But if people want to take the trouble to do that, by all means > go ahead.... Ok, I'll remove the check then if that's ok with you. Nico