From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22534: File notify broken on Windows Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:18:59 +0100 Message-ID: <871t8rm5x8.fsf@gmx.de> References: <83h9hrytom.fsf@gnu.org> <87lh72xln0.fsf@gmx.de> <838u30wbx5.fsf@gnu.org> <83fux7v56c.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454692824 25389 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2016 17:20:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:20:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22534@debbugs.gnu.org To: Fabrice Popineau Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 05 18:20:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aRk3H-0007Bq-Bv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:20:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49585 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRk3G-0002El-IM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54907) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRk3D-0002Cg-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRk38-0005mg-Po for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRk38-0005mc-M7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:20:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRk38-0002Qd-HF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22534 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22534-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22534.14546927499266 (code B ref 22534); Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22534) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Feb 2016 17:19:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34620 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRk2G-0002PO-RW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:19:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:57935) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRk2E-0002Ou-RG for 22534@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:19:07 -0500 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.56.6]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MVvB2-1aYHVc1YWu-00X85N; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 18:19:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Fabrice Popineau's message of "Fri, 5 Feb 2016 16:34:17 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:f7vT/w01me5KyKZPqWO+h52Mld8YxgxF8fQ6ED0E06hdi6Nx4HX iYOgUpqoOcwQuSG70IDfF0gdYnuPB/JBakyC+i9ny/sFwC/e5gJljcRBG+Dc8b6qHcTcgmk F0mnyaY5jGJemnZdejDMG8ngMzQy8YLG5OWj6VmQbj7WvHrBohz3ZXPZ5BpiJkXvabF0FKw bNLnU1ahdwUXADRlBnQ6w== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ag+wDCDUfoU=:iSaYvv4BzpHjOMcZQOYkH0 nuBg4azDsCf8byq4YQx4i2s/c7WzWnccEuAz3tF0Nilv3n9AnOELESUrujLZk8X0RmLl4GOHX 5R6N6mth8CknGyDbdpRuAuFToARchlDAsw5FljZ0imLwLdZXvTtUvfSP6CCH8zoNg6txrUyCn ZYSxw2X7m90fGvJpcdL1ct4sSAnW/KF17rGkIVnmAS/2MAXt9qqfWgGiC5ca4k+SqezbDRqL+ rb5xMzgaxqQZCnGhB30dMubWJ0snOUtCH38GwQPNXi0Oj5zSp53hIi1IaihiEe8NiB5olY/Ia SJAkbRE7fTXqHb/Wc0VdHXVyKHZqLfXo2PAJwMM5x7LOh3xGr9ckhHgCjoRLj/RCCBzllpeQ5 DWd7/EAXKh1D4Tggr28q9Y8Nmzk1zU0EnkVpEaqNCedXanyULiCdkBB+2NiRMDvqJLTsg71dA Eck7bVXttYa4v+2xVPTOq/uWIdq9AczNjxl6AsorR6DvZBLLx13kmZ3YrtbF9kuE9ViYAAyRp 3ukC0FoTVZnSfhLSvr0E2vancr6E7iuEgpkTSIN1HaM7QSvNELyGpa8wTelpm+w+KSKFpcLy6 ttyYxTLvxoMQoVC1K7PhcmL2YmZycj51/2a2+8h80tTStxqfIYvvjVQlRvCwWtscItsa6hl+/ c5z3j/Lk3ptZ6ic1BpyvdYMnTffiULWB/6/Qcsi//oKTtW+Z3T79uoA/mDDuoUwgAVihpBO/5 78ZaE0DBfL+DiffMuSRGgWzdH2zzJL1kSwvmiZ0qtEqJj30DHD8P5whjX4TPDpnghyz2Pf1a X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112506 Archived-At: Fabrice Popineau writes: Hi, > I have tried with different values of file-notify--test-timeout but it > doesn't seem to make any difference. I also boosted the size of the > file_notifications[] array (* 16) without any difference. I have > tested with sit-for between each rename operation and it does not work > either above 260 files Is it worth to continue to look for the problem in w32notify? I would simply set the loop limit there to 250, that's it. file-notify-test06-many-events is a stress test. Originally, Wolfgang Jenkner proposed it with 10.000 iterations - that was *really* much too long. [Eli] > (To tell the truth, I'm not sure what is the purpose of that test: > AFAIK, none of the available notification back-ends ever promised > not to lose events, so what are we testing here? Perhaps Michael > can explain.) As said, it was intended as stress test. But we are free to adapt it to the limitations of the underlying backend. > Fabrice Best regards, Michael.