From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24030: 25.0.95; mouse-drag-region regression Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 11:33:29 -0600 Message-ID: <871t2j2b6e.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y44x2s7v.fsf@gmail.com> <83wpkgz83a.fsf@gnu.org> <871t2mw6el.fsf@gmail.com> <83twfgv76y.fsf@gnu.org> <83d1m4utkc.fsf@gnu.org> <83zip7t9a7.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469381666 5814 80.91.229.3 (24 Jul 2016 17:34:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24030@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 24 19:34:14 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNI4-0000Ls-8Z for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 19:34:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56880 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNI3-0000Ej-BG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:34:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44219) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNHx-0000A3-G8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNHu-0000SP-9j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNHu-0000SL-6b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNHu-0001fd-30 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alex Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24030 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24030-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24030.14693816376410 (code B ref 24030); Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24030) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jul 2016 17:33:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36007 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNHo-0001fK-TK for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:33:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f43.google.com ([209.85.214.43]:34933) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bRNHn-0001f7-1g for 24030@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 13:33:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f43.google.com with SMTP id u186so70547941ita.0 for <24030@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:33:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=nide5rhf6EZYX1hhq0fCT65KLb6lGFl8siT0cecA814=; b=sRH69HlK5lLBtnwUrdAtt3YIYpaCTtCrSluHb747fCKPTTVEFqznssWCRAUDMIhW4r D+6Ntg7XMZgP76JcmKgSYpgy4yvjEjPjOqi34auZEVg9JTO1h2lrouy7+swPxfh2VUpy VugIdXXX1XVYXgbi++1hH7bbjHyvRB3624Pk032/kZv8Yo7F3ICM1hhXtX5a/KVEuKQ5 BEB2Buem5CfqH/bpFGbLlHMenG3j1ZAd1by+0Uy5/yv8DakZBYR9n9vUp3IbUGp3I1dU iw7a4m85GNYb0U2b9bleRMxm2MosIsDSqUBuHYwCvVkWXP0aR3yl9otb29iIZtT9dimE aeYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=nide5rhf6EZYX1hhq0fCT65KLb6lGFl8siT0cecA814=; b=gLrIro6uFFlXnVMf5Z8K31MZSE4nYoRW38ONFh8eneGG6UEU+wGOqHlcsQpf/y8jge BuM/uKpkWQj62vUP6YuhA+9j/BloZc6hv+hN5XxWdDMklRe7K6UKvLJ/hbMiMRbbKqQT pZWAlao0AgzmmNx9wfQmx3GL5oPBU8imTK8Uq9up9iezg6FxxPGWm9IlnkGkwe+TagmS bnYAd2PX+IwudkuktLrP7sATvkqqNhWeGlS7m8oED0kBbdkGkYysTpW2D+9OlLmqW+TD EPjCEgdm6WByk7xMLzDFjVriIT5KfZFdROE9hVhHZEoWakkfTn09Mzf9AJ+gwWgh3sr+ 32kw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousD/qrPDuymfkepHXtCUiakrq1xbzx+yd8JJbJ/dzCOph00fnOK/gCUN55xpMTu+A== X-Received: by 10.36.107.211 with SMTP id v202mr15770866itc.51.1469381629571; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:33:49 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from lylat (S01061859339e9903.ss.shawcable.net. [174.2.107.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o188sm7663568itg.11.2016.07.24.10.33.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 24 Jul 2016 10:33:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83zip7t9a7.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2016 17:12:16 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121493 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stefan Monnier >> Cc: agrambot@gmail.com, 24030@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2016 17:16:37 -0400 >> >> > that creates a buffer-local binding for it. That is why select-window >> > gives deactivate-mark a non-nil value: select-window makes the >> > window's buffer the current one, which assigns buffer-local values to >> > all of it variables, including deactivate-mark. Then this >> > buffer-local value is being examined by mouse-drag-region. >> >> Indeed, this is a problem here because of have a "stale" setting of >> deactivate-mark. >> >> Maybe something like the patch below will do? > > It didn't solve the problem here. Did it work for you? FWIW both of the patches worked for me.