From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nikolaus Rath Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The current state of the comment-cache branch Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 08:45:15 -0800 Message-ID: <871swsf1es.fsf@thinkpad.rath.org> References: <20161223215056.GA2771@acm.fritz.box> <83fuldzre1.fsf@gnu.org> <20161224083054.GA2212@acm.fritz.box> <83bmw1zoy8.fsf@gnu.org> <20161224094246.GD2212@acm.fritz.box> <20161224113620.GF2212@acm.fritz.box> <20161227175500.GD2324@acm.fritz.box> <83y3z0ukth.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1482943543 16081 195.159.176.226 (28 Dec 2016 16:45:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 16:45:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 28 17:45:40 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cMHLz-0002He-Pj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 17:45:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59995 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMHM4-0004Oj-NB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:45:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49283) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMHLv-0004OU-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:45:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMHLs-0002zV-9C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:45:23 -0500 Original-Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:56959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cMHLs-0002z3-41 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:45:20 -0500 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A2A20D8F for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:45:17 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:45:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s= smtpout; bh=2LYLuZbnf3NO9o8N5QpIBPnyh80=; b=KF0ePnwyYzvV511Xp9MV EfdoRFqvF05v55ZCKyARSei6nM2Yq6mkppQ0GMEaKjjuB15qSVrXLdVKNphqsZkG /5wrKrgNqe5MYSQLk2O+YMpS7hWIKNar71JX+vB3JD5w7lCW6c3M9mWq8MCggmcv Jjv8wpv2k9Q+LeDIychnvnI= X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: n12I5tSrS1VirrnS1iyVEMPczUE6JmURnO+zUQshqGmw 1482943517 Original-Received: from ebox.rath.org (ebox.rath.org [45.79.69.51]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9B4397E077 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:45:17 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from thinkpad.rath.org (thinkpad [192.168.12.2]) by ebox.rath.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 910952C0 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 16:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by thinkpad.rath.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 35918BFF27; Wed, 28 Dec 2016 08:45:16 -0800 (PST) Mail-Copies-To: never Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <83y3z0ukth.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 28 Dec 2016 17:36:58 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.25 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:210899 Archived-At: On Dec 28 2016, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 17:55:00 +0000 >> Cc: emacs-devel , Eli Zaretskii >> From: Alan Mackenzie >>=20 >> > I'm still wondering how useful this could be for C code though. There = are >> > many coding conventions where the opening { of a function does not go = in >> > the left-most column. As far as I understand, such coding conventions = would >> > lead to slower parsing? >>=20 >> This convention is not useful for C. > > Our coding standards clearly call for starting a function's body with > an opening brace in column zero. I would hope that Emacs is used not only to edit its own source code but also other code, for which these standards don't apply. Best, -Nikolaus --=20 GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F =C2=BBTime flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.=C2= =AB