From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: `thunk-let'? Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:19:02 +0100 Message-ID: <871skfokux.fsf@web.de> References: <87infp9z6j.fsf@web.de> <87zi90eehg.fsf@web.de> <87o9ocd6s4.fsf@web.de> <87wp2zcwm2.fsf@web.de> <87mv3vwb2c.fsf_-_@web.de> <87h8tnowl4.fsf@web.de> <83vai3asgt.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv3eb85m.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7zdbsyf.fsf@web.de> <873755hbpr.fsf@web.de> <873754bm10.fsf@web.de> <83r2so9in9.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2sk8fg7.fsf@web.de> <83y3mr6808.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512055212 21682 195.159.176.226 (30 Nov 2017 15:20:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 15:20:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 30 16:20:05 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKQd9-0005C2-HQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:20:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48819 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKQdG-0007UT-UB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:20:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40339) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKQcI-0007Rj-NV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:19:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKQcD-0005LB-1X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.14]:61984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKQcC-0005KW-Nt; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([188.106.175.242]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb004 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6gdA-1fGx7b06a4-00wWps; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:19:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83y3mr6808.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 27 Nov 2017 17:44:55 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:10quSDdgnY0uaxZPLOH7PGLMm3MOBEThx2fI+hVJhDOtdFm1/7j wGMLTr/eDPmCv1aI/3e7CKevpcgwsRIYojBlNli7AdOWgli4rcEYKY5SuDUwwWlE+2KxOis u0MBfJw08/93itFJw1qssOinFFGwQJjYM0gu4WcYNqDokTqOfNTicF4nbvW9VWW/8uW7Lip p72J7oaQUHxiVsqFwH7rQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:uuCqTDzxSXE=:G39nO/XF0xW2N+B9m9gRqg tIl8aPOPBhXmPn/X/tRLl03Uk3I2oxOOx9XxsYtiBLgEaeSXVqp6NocY2idhtDnuKbF5YHVpg XcFM30L27Zf1ogl1gnBakscwHr/NIZLdRNkGan/Y1rGms//hfjjvxd7i5FcBVNrV9cs+NQEvS 62Sm5N7tDQn2kyO38u9ozHN90aNQCX/J8WXqVd7SeS1cozyv2HEPTI5i87LqMKQH2noQMrIuq xpAfjMb8KyAiDZrnDzy0nZicRboSn3Dd33gqmdkMuvtNTtqkODf45Zsq1RhGbBIqeICUimakq ROTaH77N1nwjMKu/xMr3P6fKKIQ7lRdjXvNPkVcLPkI8+WsTBGxpFtH4E7t5CMOWdjFJ0u7a2 fd+NlowoyODwZoC0StXFDAPAjEIPijNGb/0q+38HyKeq3RK7/14hroKZ1Ls8eUQwywKyhY3WW KCMTFL5hqPrXErZn2fX7JaP+FrRmtKVbOTh87Emufqd6RQT+uorP+yahAcRxgJvHn38i/ctW/ 1xEPCciCSHrzNkYg1i6/G/6L6KwQ/c5RZXKfvjLc41uYeO+BHNss7dZkM3B6ULm0OU9ukuluk OOAD3qRyN58ksiILjOAlLojm7pdOIlU/tu6Oyj9FiqN8ryXLwO0SLGaJYWATVOuebi/X1DPWn LIesHUwu3RnxFOOitDs1e5G7eSuuthRynWC45G/UqxLLUMgrReqmwLHmqx1lo+6PQUcat+clG o0uKbYiF6XppjEp04LdJaKvFb8JGw1alUfBn/L82wE2Hok9uZiK22U9F3eurUygCo9zBNvUy X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.14 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220548 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > I think you're over-thinking it. If I were you, I'd go with > > thunk-let which doesn't need any authorization/argument, yet works > > well enough. If/when it turns out to become wildly popular or > > unacceptably confusing, we can add an alias and/or rename it. > > I agree. Ok, then let's do this. I've commented out the `defalias' calls. Michael.