From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5950: defvaralias after defvar should be warned in runtime Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 19:54:34 -0400 Message-ID: <871sdyezwl.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4BC6A096.8030801@yahoo.co.jp> <87r5gu34ag.wl%irieshinsuke@yahoo.co.jp> <3keicu1h3v.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <874liufjfj.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527378788 13091 195.159.176.226 (26 May 2018 23:53:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 23:53:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: IRIE Shinsuke , 5950@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun May 27 01:53:04 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fMizf-0003JP-0C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 27 May 2018 01:53:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50451 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMj1l-0001Ri-Ju for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 19:55:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47025) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMj1e-0001R3-In for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 19:55:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMj1a-0006S4-L7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 19:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:42128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fMj1a-0006R0-HH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 19:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fMj1a-0008U6-Aj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 19:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 23:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5950 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 5950-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5950.152737888332564 (code B ref 5950); Sat, 26 May 2018 23:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5950) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2018 23:54:43 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50015 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fMj1H-0008TA-6g for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 19:54:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com ([209.85.223.172]:46265) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fMj1G-0008Sy-FV for 5950@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 May 2018 19:54:42 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f172.google.com with SMTP id f21-v6so10335708iob.13 for <5950@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:54:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=JQybYj71aEN0IceC4k/8rxQTGqFNblK7HjUAfyNPYEM=; b=WeHhMrO24gVd+VW4nyeT4ossjTcfEyXxZgqwgy1RxUGS4c2u0nEX3UrIcANN7Z4SBr DzWbfzRLumhj8FzSLmEFncJzNNsq4z8zeylqkxNTkxyt1B5RNqlzPeLzzNHvk75JlLZI M1ndAr/ZdwyXhl34SIAVolE/C6AOPbcmaVkZyBafb/AbiBBEH6Fjs/RvqSaxzm32l73k eiXJn/26nJOkhhtHn/pJTmt3+ajC2NTvi8EEdaFK0GSZUezgfftdlBHbQ4y/gk52bS4s 7fZxON74rW4A3mOFM4G/4bDIAfZeo5FXNl8hbO8ZSh3lDx9B+wPcd9zm4YdzCDWx/ka6 66Vg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=JQybYj71aEN0IceC4k/8rxQTGqFNblK7HjUAfyNPYEM=; b=VhLLO/h1UKr/KQnuGAnfm+p+tc7xXj2ZarS3MMbIS1Qsh2w2JtosDmww42yWdFtLA2 v0jqXo23LPGenopNWgaBd9fNf3KIlDLW9daG5sVQ0Rd1+FdgoCuXwAHpOdUMly4ijElW yA524GTNZWcwjTHAxLiU86ShOjzvAujFbLxVICw361YdBrQtg189LP/O/tQpN3qZ3lGh vVSPfxklxyFJvw3yh1uMd4+RQCZVXMywPvrdDi4HMc3L8OIp4SktQicH3f0GcEzVKz7t sBnH5YPzvvpEryAbQYv5Uc4rDk2wL/+h+rHMFkiPoJjNjL3Ele6bfdt73j+AmFE1ZsPM O2IA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfw5wlbNpDVH/RXkAcukcvLSQtWvf2adMAJr2b4hlNJUASEXg4J uxLr6GxeVr2ETIyetu9vbAzwqQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLXULLX+SrherCaw1t1Gx2Ov9SWA1xyVHEJcDlvJQ9wcEWgibhOQqhqgPaA+37b6C0wxxUSuA== X-Received: by 2002:a5e:890d:: with SMTP id k13-v6mr7201517ioj.9.1527378876744; Sat, 26 May 2018 16:54:36 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e18-v6sm5271162itc.3.2018.05.26.16.54.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 26 May 2018 16:54:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <874liufjfj.fsf@gmail.com> (Noam Postavsky's message of "Sat, 26 May 2018 12:52:48 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146583 Archived-At: >> The bootstrap warnings were about cl-custom-print-functions, >> mail-dont-reply-to-names, Oh, it's because the definition gets into loaddefs.el, but the alias doesn't. >> and several flymake-proc-* variables all of >> which correctly have the alias before the definition. Not 100% sure about the flymake ones, but I guess it's some double loading during bootstrap. Stefan Monnier writes: > I'd make it just a `message` rather than a `display-warning`. Hmm, I think it's too easy to overlook that, I prefer the in-your-face nature of display-warning.