From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Noam Postavsky Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31623: 27.0; Elisp manual, index entry "; in comment" Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 21:58:10 -0400 Message-ID: <871sdtdhvx.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87a7sica2g.fsf@gmail.com> <524f86f7-78e2-44a5-89fd-5df5fde0dda6@default> <877enmc846.fsf@gmail.com> <4fc08e13-4c43-4f4b-a9ad-0ce221b9d4ea@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1527645432 16298 195.159.176.226 (30 May 2018 01:57:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 01:57:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: 31623@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 30 03:57:08 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqMM-00048t-6j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 May 2018 03:57:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35785 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqOT-0000SO-EO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 21:59:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqOJ-0000Ru-PJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 21:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqOE-00048E-Qx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 21:59:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqOE-00047o-MW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 21:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqOE-0005Mc-FR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 21:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Noam Postavsky Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 01:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31623 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31623-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31623.152764550620575 (code B ref 31623); Wed, 30 May 2018 01:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31623) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 May 2018 01:58:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54500 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqNa-0005Lj-Tf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 21:58:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com ([209.85.223.173]:41741) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fNqNV-0005LU-VH for 31623@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 21:58:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id t5-v6so7200173ioa.8 for <31623@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:58:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=8p+/QgWgNHzG39o+++/a4AHcokiTIrcqACLyxg7MWKE=; b=MnAvFBv0QUH8URIzay5N0k8K2vohS9l0oLxARq2k5lvC7aBfA6s1ZEuAk/j7PRpEsV 1y0lRXCH4i1qeXGl8ENV83z7C2MKw30PEvbLgVpwoYyCkrpNSVBeuYdHVPXwV5pVKvj3 4XHgJhtcq/yO73/GPYLPOqJ8wiJ2iovAim02KF8McIcdi1oyYboI+1opMGB+8WqD8NfE A6JdDwSsiVYv719gyRcBBkgwLK3rI7vJWeKHskEPseayQuaN2NnqLxYwqbNS8njFQztI LcXpDt7EAXdSAb0bkKQii+c7PVxMjCIqlzdhBfgDSWiIGfXLZQQE61eASxSMjhh6a0MR T2xA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=8p+/QgWgNHzG39o+++/a4AHcokiTIrcqACLyxg7MWKE=; b=AjN0f1A+AMwUZE0K2Cjw/F26lN9EBFzAo6duoq3XiGkrzgOanxLoNsirSa/z9mMDgS qDfukj+vqMiwkZ1Rhx19UjWv0o+MdiBWjSII1aF78m62m0kFzNWaqEatcx/i8EtcJ2Wu TZJbTNg2rx5co+ikQfc1BVf8QjC+g/uthzLgsXkVoYLDctkr4FZby/r2Ctak9ZHRP2VO j+CsmeqV3eqFwXINuvp6LKn5EKPyn5S0gvasrdivvPo7aNnt9Y3EehICZNnp6bf3c5DN gYwIuOUmDwMPeQg34fhry9KuKBjh+AQEY5dD/KxXmeSKJFVMaJgGYHdQjC8hEuH/H4z2 Rpjg== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E17UIS7mE260VQ2qBS4322qQqhhoYaQ68HO/VBLOHzArOYTM68H VSwJajmwGYz4fQlbHWbRukAy2g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKLluFAwsr9meCZt629cKNUh6F3uwKOytZvZfqjHBrceMPZicK/zjlRu026JTdevDr4fueElog== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:150:: with SMTP id 77-v6mr610944iob.138.1527645492286; Tue, 29 May 2018 18:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zebian (cbl-45-2-119-34.yyz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.119.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id q21-v6sm11325106itb.4.2018.05.29.18.58.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 May 2018 18:58:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4fc08e13-4c43-4f4b-a9ad-0ce221b9d4ea@default> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 29 May 2018 17:38:49 -0700 (PDT)") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:146729 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: >> > If that's the intention then I think it might be clearer >> > if the index entry were "; outside a comment" or maybe >> > "; not in a comment". > But certainly the `;' that starts a comment is part of the > comment itself. No one would doubt that, I think. I'm a bit puzzled then. How would "; outside a comment" make sense for a page which talks about comments? That seems to be the opposite of what it's about. > The entry should indicate something about the subject > indexed. "; in comment" does not do that, for me, at > least. What do you think about the "(...) in lists" entry? > Or perhaps you have a suggestion. I don't really see a problem with the current one, but I guess "; for commenting" (in the same vein as "' for quoting") could be okay.